|
Parent Article: Men's Rights resources |
|
More Unsubstantive Gibberish |
by ML
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
24 May 2002
Modified: 25 May 2002 |
Aleph,
So you voted for Clinton? Now there's a fine example of how men should treat women.
Not that I'm saying that that whole sad side of the last President (yes, HE was actually ELECTED to office, unlike the current resident of the Whitehouse) justified the circus that the Republicans turned it into, but the claim that somehow voting for Democrats makes you somehow OK on gender issues is ridiculous. You're just confused about your principles.
Besides, Clinton was actually a conservative dressed up as a pseudeo-liberal. Voting for him doesn't actually mean you support a liberal agenda. In addition, most of the readers and authors on this website consider themselves radical, so loving liberalism alone won't win you many friends here, let alone support for your non-argument about the relevance of the men's "rights" movement.
And "...",
I would like you to cite specific examples of the laws you claim are "stacked against" men. True, there are some laws that level the playing field as a remedy for a power structure still heavily weghed against women, but I would hardly call that a stacked deck... unless you were used to having the deck stacked in your favor. Maybe that had something to do with your present family situation.
As for the quote you cite, you aren't reading closely enough. It was referring to info in an article on one of the websites that composes the original "article" above. It wasn't J. who missed that point about violence, rather it was one of the websites that you think are so full of "timely and relevant" information.
And neither of you has offered much in the way of "facts" to defend your argument, as "catswold" demands. But I don't take him seriously, so neither should you, especially self-avowed liberal Aleph Null. |
