Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://127.0.0.1/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | View comments | Email this Article
News :: Miscellaneous
Air Defences stood down on 9 11 Current rating: 0
23 Dec 2001
Modified: 26 Dec 2001
A cover-up is only secure if you control 100% of the information, if you only control 98% you run the risk of exposure!
See also:
www.rense.com
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

This Article Is BS
Current rating: 0
23 Dec 2001
Since I'm currently away from most of my reference material, I can't give a full refutation of this highly erroneous article. It should be noted that, from the long list of bases cited by the author, only Langley AFB and one or two others in the Northeast are actually bases that have aircraft assigned to the air defense mission. The others may have aircraft available, but this means little in the context of Sept. 11. Even bases that had assigned aircraft only had two planes on alert at any particular time. This is nothing new, as the US air defense mission has been scaled back to this status since the end of the Cold War. The aircraft at Langley, for instance, actually were deployed there from their homebase in North Dakota.

In addition, the palns for air defense by NORAD were all designed to deal with a threat from aircraft coming into the US from outside, NOT from hostile aircraft already within US airspace. In hindsight, this is short-sighted, given what we now realize can happen. The author proves little or nothing of what is being charged.
Some Factual Background
Current rating: 0
26 Dec 2001
On NORAD's history:
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/airdef/norad-overview.htm

On the strategy behind NORAD interveptor bases, pre-Sept. 11:
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/airdef/overview.htm

"A dedicated continental air defense force is no longer needed."
This one is a report from 1994. It details the very limited air defense program that was in existence then and proposals to cut it even further. Way before and totally unrelated to Sept. 11.
http://www.fas.org/man/gao/gao9476.htm

Buried in this article is the fact that there were a total (for the entire US) of 20 Air National Guard interceptors on alert at 10 different locations across the entire US.
http://www.ang.af.mil/ngb/paih/heritage.htm

This copy of a Washington Post article says that the force structure for intercept operations was distributed to a total of only seven bases nationwide on Spet. 11. The only bases in the Northeast with alert aircraft were Otis AFB in Massachusetts and Langley AFB in Virginia.
http://www.freedomdomain.com/Templemount/9_15c.html
Note: This website spins pretty flaky stuff, but it had the Washington Post article available. I can't vouch for anything else on it, however.