|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
News :: Environment |
|
Arctic and Midwest climate change |
Current rating: 0 |
by Pat N self-only
Email: npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified!) |
11 Mar 2005
Modified: 04:53:54 PM |
|
Presentations on climate change in the Arctic and within the Midwest were made by Arctic Explorer Will Steger and Chief Meteorologist Paul Douglas. The presentations were made at the state capitol in Minnesota on 21 February 2005. |
Click on image for a larger version  |
A video of the presentation can now be viewed, free, at: http://www.me3.org/
Arctic explorer Will Steger showed drastic changes in the polar areas and said: "more than anything else we need leadership", "global climate change could very easily go out of control".
Paul Douglas talked about climate change resulting in more extreme weather conditions, more droughts and heat waves, and "with more flash flooding and river flooding", and discussed impacts to Midwest agriculture ... calling for more research to grow crops with increased heat and drought.
Pat Neuman
Hydrologist/Climate Studies
http://profiles.yahoo.com/patneuman2000 |
Click on image for a larger version  |
See also:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleontology_and_Climate_Articles/
|
This work is in the public domain |
Comments
|
Monthly Average Dewpoints |
by patneuman2000
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
11 Mar 2005
|
Click on image for a larger version
 | Click on image for a larger version
 | Click on image for a larger version
 |
|
Higher dewpoints during snowmelt periods can increase the rate of melt due to latent heat of condensation, as moist air condenses on the colder snow and ice. |
|
Earlier in the year snowmelt runoff |
by patneuman2000
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
11 Mar 2005
|
 |
The river stations shown include:
- -St. Louis River at Scanlon (near Duluth), Minnesota
-- St. Croix River at St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin
-- Red River at Fargo, North Dakota |
|
Wake Up! It can be late! |
by Wayne D. Pickette
waynedougpick (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
12 Mar 2005
|
|
It is so tragic that under these circumstances I still can't finish my heat engine, as nobody is offering not even a hand to help but, what I need currently, only a tip of a finger to give me the financial possibility to finish and implement it. We are so close to the reality of the movie A Day After Tomorrow, and people are still blind and selfish in the most narrow-minded and suicidal way. |
|
Special Report – Air Temperatures & Dew Points - Great Lakes States |
by Pat Neuman
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
12 Mar 2005
|
Great Lakes States:
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan,
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and New York.
For text and tables of my article that shows climate data at stations in the Great Lakes states
please go to:
http://www.mnforsustain.org/mn_dewpoints_neuman_p_special_report.htm
Article date: April 16, 2003 |
|
Earlier in the Year Snowmelt Runoff ... for Rivers in MN, WI and ND |
by Pat Neuman
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
12 Mar 2005
|
Earlier in the Year Snowmelt Runoff and Increasing Dewpoints for Rivers in Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota
Patrick J. Neuman, Snow Hydrologist
September 11, 2003
The original article and data can be viewed
at:
http://www.mnforsustain.org/climate_snowmelt_dewpoints_minnesota_neuman.htm
See also:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/ |
|
A proposal titled "CONSERVE, NOW" - to reduce greenhouse gas emissions |
by Pat N
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
12 Mar 2005
|
CONSERVE, NOW to reduce GHG emissions
is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/message/229
Thank you. |
|
Global Land Air Temperature |
by Pat Neuman
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (verified) |
Current rating: 0
13 Mar 2005
|
Click on image for a larger version
 |  |
The link to this article at this Urbana-Champaign IMC site has been spread around the U.S. Thus I need to make sure the article is complete.
If anyone has any questions, please send me an e-mail at npat1 (at) juno.com
My special thanks to Urbana-Champaign IMC. |
|
Important notice to viewers |
by Pat Neuman
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
14 Mar 2005
|
The figures and graphs for "Arctic and Midwest climate change" are now at:
http://www.ntimc.org
Specifially, at:
http://www.ntimc.org/newswire.php?story_id=2110 |
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by Wayne D. Pickette
waynedougpick (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
16 Mar 2005
|
|
The pictures of this article, which are not retrievable now by Microsoft Internet Explorer, can be still retrieved and saved on readers' computers by some other browsers, for example, Mozilla Firefox |
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by Wayne D. Pickette
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
16 Mar 2005
|
|
Sorry, the name of browser is Mozilla Firefox, but now it is not retrieving pictures, as well. This is obviously global censorship. Seems to be a sign of a very dangerous situation with Arctic climate, etc.. |
|
Midwest and Great Plains Climate Change (figures and graphs) |
by Pat N
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
17 Mar 2005
|
----
Hi Wayne,
I went to chicago.indymedia .
My latest includes...
"Not to be short sighted on global warming
and damage to the ozone layer"
Government and business leaders must not continue to act short sightedly in making decisions which have negative impacts on global climate change and damage to Earth's protective ozone layer.
Although heat waves seem rare now, the frequency and severity of heat waves are increasing.
Although holes in the protective ozone layer seem rare now, to what extent will the number and size of holes in the ozone layer change?
To what extent will additional pollution by aviation damage the ozone protection?
To what extent will increasing tropospheric warming (with increasing stratospheric cooling) increase the damage to the ozone layer?
To what extent will ozone layer protection at the surface from ultra violet radiation change as the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere doubles, triples ... ?
How rapid will the global climate warm?
How rapid will the ozone layer weaken?
See:
http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/infodata/faq.php
That bothers me.
"Midwest and Great Plains Climate Change (figures and graphs)"
1. Beginning day snowmelt runoff (1901-2004)
2. Leech L. Dam low temperatures (1890-2004)
3. Global Land Air Temperatures (1880-2004)
Additional information
Beginning Day of Snowmelt Runoff
http://www.mnforsustain.org/climate_snowmelt_dewpoints_minnesota_neuman.htm
Special Report – Great Lakes States
http://www.mnforsustain.org/mn_dewpoints_neuman_p_special_report.htm
Global Land Air Temperatures raw data
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleontology_and_Climate_Articles/message/2450
CONSERVE, NOW - reduce fossil fuel emissions
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/message/229
NOAA's Climate Monitoring and Diagnostic Laboratory website - on greenhouse gases
-- Question --
"How do we know CO2 in the atmosphere
is increasing? And that humans are
responsible?"
-- Answer --
"Careful measurements have confirmed that CO2 is increasing in the atmosphere and that human activities are the primary cause. CO2 measurements have been taken directly from the atmosphere over the past few decades. CO2 trends for earlier times have been derived from measurements of CO2 trapped in air bubbles in glacial or polar ice. The 30% increase in atmospheric CO2 observed since pre-industrial times cannot be explained by natural causes. CO2 concentrations have varied naturally throughout Earth’s history. However, CO2 concentrations are now higher than any seen in at least the past 450,000 years."
http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/infodata/faq.php
That bothers me.
See also:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleontology_and_Climate_Articles/
----
http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/54275/index.php
---- |
See also:
http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/54275/index.php
http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/54275/index.php
|
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by Wayne Pickette
waynedougpick (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
21 Mar 2005
|
The message below always occurs when IE6 is used to view this article on this computer.....
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /usermedia/image/12/large/image2931_GlobalTemperatureGraph.gif on this server.
ML, what exactly does the above mean? |
|
Sounds Like a Database Issue |
by ML
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
21 Mar 2005
|
Hi Wayne,
I sound like it might be a database issue, but I am not certain. This version of Dada, the software that runs the site, is getting a bit long in tooth. We're hoping for a new version soon. In the meantime, we are finding various little things like this that we're not quite sure how to fix.
You might want to poke around on the websites mentioned in the original article or email the author, who probably can send you the missing chart directly.
I get the same error and I'm using Netscape 7, so I don't think it is a browser issue. |
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by Wayne Pickette
waynedougpick (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
21 Mar 2005
|
ML, speaking of a bit long in tooth, from that last post you need to get some rest.
As for the database error, some data:
Both netscape & Internet Explorer handle cookies.
Mozilla in it's default configuration excludes most cookies, I can see the charts with Mozilla. |
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by Pat
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
22 Mar 2005
|
I wish people wouldn't write this junk.
The fraudulent author on global warming is Derek Kelly, PhD.
http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2004/03/27361_comment.php#38159
Friday February 25, 2005 at 02:37 AM
The global warming scam
By Derek Kelly, PhD
Scam, noun: a swindle, a fraudulent arrangement.
A chronology of climate change
...
"Instead of reducing CO2, we should, perhaps, be increasing it. We should pay the smokestack industries hard dollars for every kilogram of soot they pump into the atmosphere. Instead of urging Chinese to stop using coal and turn instead to nuclear-generated electricity, we should beg them to continue using coal. Rather than bringing us to the edge of global-warming catastrophe, anthropogenic climate change may have spared us descent into what would be the most serious and far-reaching challenge facing humankind in the 21st century - dealing with a rapidly deteriorating climate that wants to plunge us into an ice age. Let's hope Antarctica and Greenland melt. Let's hope the sea levels rise. All life glorifies warmth. Only death prefers the icy fingers of endless winter." |
|
Understanding the relevance of measures of temperature. |
by Peter K Anderson
hartlod (nospam) bigpond.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
15 Feb 2006
Modified: 06:46:43 PM |
 |
There seems to be a real lack of understanding in how relevant numerous measures of temperature can be in developing any climate model that is VALID and functional when those measures are made is such small time frames.
This fetish for 'temperature' plots is not able to validate opinions of 'global warming' due to inadequate statistical methods being employed. One million data points in the last 30 years is only defining a statistically insignificant time-frame of the overall climate oscillation. 100 Million data points in 50, or 100 years, is of no more help in validating either model or opinion.
If one observes an actual curve in too fine a detail, one might think that one is looking at a linear plot. This is the basis of what if happening; the 'global warmers' have taken a little bit of a curve within an oscillation and made it to be a 'styled' relationship that does not notice the actual process.
Being avoided also is the noted warming/cooling/warming mini oscillation occurring in global climate since 1880. This micro-oscillation has been noted in many comments in many places by many people.
There is also the motion of human population across the surface in line with population growth, as shown in the slide I include here. The alteration of the surface associated with this increase in population has led to alterations of what would be 'pleasant green terrain' to become covered to various densities in coverage of concrete and asphalt.
WE all know that concrete and asphalt get very much hotter than even grassed terrain, and the increase in surface region of concrete and asphalt has led to the small increase in average SURFACE temperatures observed as 0.6 degrees C.
As humanity grows in numbers, the 'western' population will stagnate, and growth in the presently 'lesser developed nations' (ligher color in colum plot) will see sprawl across what is now mostly 'green' covered terrain (view geographical plot with marginal terrain overlayed, Humanity is less likley to produce hebitat in deserts).
From slide 1, you see that the energy that can be incident to the surface is in the lower and upper Visible spectrum, and the lower one third of the UV spectrum. Realise also that the energy in the Gamma and XRay spectrums is deflected by interactions of plasma creation invovling the magnetic field of this planet, so unlike Venus, such Gamma adn Xray energy is not entering our biosphere. Photosynthesis primaryily consumes energy within the lower and upper visible spectrum, leaving only teh energy in teh lower one third of the UV spectrum (NOT REGION) constantly surface incident.
So more concrete and asphalt is reducing the photosynthetic covering in a primary manner, other human activities reducing suchin lessenign degrees. This allows more energy to be free to be producing greater inductance of kinetic energy and a futher rise in average surface temperature. NO possible need to invoke a supposed 'greenhouse effect AT ALL in reality.
WE have barely 200 years of records and even then for only various portion of the region as it were ‘settled’. On a scale of global climate, even one million data points within those 200 years is only defining well a ‘statistically insignificant period’.
The overall natural climate cycle saw an ‘Ice Age’ being to revert ~20,000 years ago, which occupies the ‘trough’ of the climate oscillation.
Look to:- < http://www.museum.state.il.us/exhibits/ice_ages/ > for more information.
We are all now at, if not even within, the ‘peak’ of that oscillation. WE have a dry equatorial zone, with a heavily photosynthetic covering of the temperate zone (if you include the photosynthetic mass so far removed by Humanity within the last 400 years) and warming Polar Regions.
There is no reason to think that the motion of the oscillation peak will progress any faster than through a trough (and its often contained “Ice Age”) and so ‘peak oscillation climate fluctuations’ could last multiple centuries.
As such the ‘peak’ will present shifting behaviors, in as far as Humanity defines ‘seasons’ (which need not be considered ‘natural and permanent’ being definitions OF Humanity only) without any needed periodicity in these alterations. Rain patterning will alter its density and distribution. Wind and ocean currents will show some disturbances to various degrees.
These will manifest differing behaviors within regions that are NOT 'global' in scale.
One such region is in and around the Gulf of Mexico, which can at this point within the oscillation, produce storms of vast surface coverage from little more energy than currently available. These events are those that open the multiple sea channels along the Florida coastline and nearby environs (New Orleans for example has seen ONE open) which produce the 'Lake Land' that the State of Florida region HAS been in the 'past'.
The present cycle we are within would appear to have persisted for around 2 MILLION years.
WE are placed to notice a ‘topple’ of climate, to observe such a rare event that it night only occur in this manner every ~50,000 years with the “Ice Age’ ‘in the middle’, and all we do is try to blame a supposed ‘greenhouse effect’ induced by ‘humanity’ and use this as a ‘scare’ to hide opinion behind, as it is being used in attacks on ‘Desalination’ and other more obviously politically opinioned rhetoric, like that surrounding the “Kyoto Protocol’. Personally if people wish to believe in a ‘greenhouse effect’ I care little, but when they attempt to produce their belief as justification to prevent needed, necessary, practical and efficient remediations to REAL and present problems, my patience dwindles very rapidly, as it does when these same 'beliefs' are used to produce otherwise unsupportable demands for remediation of the presented 'processes' that 'exist' within that 'belief'.
The plots of human population reproduce exactly in shape that seen in 'co2 plots', and it is therefore NOT possible to remove the population attached surface rematerialing produced by the humanity and alterations to planetary surface kinetic energy induction rates. There is then also the inability of CO2 to actually produce behavior that is in any manner consistent with that presented as 'greenhouse behavior' within the supposed 'greenhouse effect'.
It is rapidly becoming evident that the last thing one does to gain understanding of 'climate' is ask a 'climatologist'.
Lastly, the materials involved and the systems used within 'climatology' are all in general use by many of the near 500 MILLION Other tertiary educated individuals who use these materials and systems to produce products every day. This includes attempts to proffer a 'greenhouse effect' as existent, amongst other very obvious flaws in method and interpretations.
There is no closed shop attitude to be tolerated when the method of making the 'shop' is so obviously flawed.
Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm) Member of the Public, Australia.
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod (at) bigpond.com
With regard to other common knowledge:-
--------------------
'A chronology of climate change'
During most of the last billion years the Earth did not have permanent ice sheets. Nevertheless, at times large areas of the globe were covered with vast sheets of ice. Such times are known as glaciations. In the past 2 million to 3 million years, the temperature of the Earth has changed (warmed or cooled) at least 17 times, some say 33, with glaciations that last about 100,000 years interrupted by warm periods that last about 10,000 years.
The last glaciation began 70,000 years ago and ended about 10,000 years ago. The Earth was a lot colder than it is now; snow and ice had accumulated on a lot of the land, glaciers existed on large areas and the sea levels were lower.
15,000 years ago: The last glaciation reaches a peak, with continental glaciers that cover a lot of the sub-polar and polar areas of the land areas of Earth. In North America, all of New England and all of the Great Lakes area, most of Ohio, Indiana, Minnesota and the North Dakotas, lie under ice sheets hundreds of meters thick. More than 37 million cubic kilometers of ice was tied up in these global sheets of ice. The average temperature on the surface of the Earth is estimated to have been cooler by approximately 6 degrees Celsius than currently. The sea level was more than 90 meters lower than currently.
15,000 years ago to 6,000 years ago: Global warming begins. The sheets of ice melt, and sea levels rise. Some heat source causes approximately 37 million cubic kilometers of ice to melt in approximately 9,000 years. Around 9,500 years ago, the last of the Northern European sheets of ice leave Scandinavia. Around 7,500 years ago, the last of the American sheets of ice leave Canada. This warming is neither stable nor the same everywhere. There are periods when mountain glaciers advance, and periods when they withdraw. These climatic changes vary extensively from place to place, with some areas affected while others are not. The tendency of warming is global and obvious, but very uneven. The causes of this period of warming are unknown.
8,000 years ago to 4,000 years ago: About 6,000 years ago, temperatures on the surface of Earth are about 3 degrees warmer than currently. The Arctic Ocean is ice-free, and mountain glaciers have disappeared from the mountains of Norway and the Alps in Europe, and from the Rocky Mountains of the United States and Canada. The ocean of the world is some three meters higher than currently. A lot of the present desert of the Sahara has a more humid, savannah-like climate, with giraffes and savannah fauna species.
4,000 years ago to AD 900: Global cooling begins. The Arctic Ocean freezes over, mountain glaciers form once more in the Rocky Mountains, in Norway and in the Alps. The Black Sea freezes over several times, and ice forms on the Nile in Egypt. Northern Europe gets a lot wetter, and the marshes develop again in previously dry areas. The sea level drops to approximately its present level. The temperatures on the surface of the Earth are about 0.5-1 degree cooler than at present. The causes of this period of cooling are unknown.
AD 1000 to 1500: This period has quick, but uneven, warming of the climate of the Northern Hemisphere. The North Atlantic becomes ice-free and Norse exploration as far as North America takes place. The Norse colonies in Greenland even export crop surpluses to Scandinavia. Wine grapes grow in southern Britain. The temperatures are from 3-8 degrees warmer than currently. The period lasts only a brief 500 years. By the year 1500, it has vanished. The Earth experiences as much warming between the 11th and the 13th century as is now predicted by global-warming scientists for the next century. The causes of this period of warming are unknown.
1430 to 1880: This is a period of the fast but uneven cooling of Northern Hemisphere climates. Norwegian glaciers advance to their most distant extension in post-glacial times. The northern forests disappear, to be replaced with tundra. Severe winters characterize a lot of Europe and North America. The channels and rivers get colder, the snows get heavy, and the summers cool and short. The temperatures on the surface of the world are about 0.5-1.5 degrees cooler than present. In the United States, 1816 is known as the "year with no summer". Snow falls in New England in June. The widespread failure of crops and deaths due to hypothermia are common. The causes of this period of cooling are unknown.
1880 to 1940: A period of warming. The mountain glaciers recede and the ice in the Arctic Ocean begins to melt again. The causes of this period of warming are unknown.
1940 to 1977: Cooling period. The temperatures are cooler than currently. Mountain glaciers recede, and some begin to advance. The causes of this period of cooling are unknown.
1977 to present: Warming period. The summer of 2003 is said to be the warmest one since the Middle Ages. The causes of this period of warming are unknown.
----- |
 |  |
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by wendy bell
wbell (nospam) hearst.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
17 Mar 2006
|
Hi there --
I stumbled upon your fascinating research while working on a news story for WTAE TV in Pittsburgh on climate change...and how our wildlife is being impacted. Can you point me to better resources? Or good contacts? This is a long-term project, not a wham-bam story.
Thank you! |
|
Re: Arctic and Midwest climate change |
by pat n
npat1 (nospam) juno.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
17 Mar 2006
|
Wendy,
For articles and blog discussion you may find the realclimate.org site helpful, at:
http://www.realclimate.org/
My work on temperature plots at:
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/patneuman2000/my_photos
Up-to-date articles on global warming at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/ |
|
