Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://127.0.0.1/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | View comments | Email this Article
Announcement :: Civil & Human Rights
ICAHD Launches Bottom-up E-mail Campaign Current rating: 0
19 Feb 2005
A new campaign from the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions to apply more international pressure to the Israeli government.
There is a point of critical mass for the policies of expansion and settlement in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. It could very well be that the settlement and development in the West Bank is beyond the point of no return. There are various solutions available to address settlements in the West Bank ranging from the dismantling of settlements in a two-state solution to broader ideas of federated bi-nationalism, a regional Middle-Eastern Union, or even a one-state solution. In order for any just solution to become feasible, Palestinians must be able to remain on their land with a viable economy and infrastructure. If Israeli policies are not checked in the immediate future, many Palestinian communities will be irreparably destroyed. For example, if the current annexation of agricultural lands from the village of Jayyous succeeds, the economy of the village will be destroyed. Even if the parties reach a solution that includes the dismantling of the settlements, it will not help the people of Jayyous who will be forced to move if the Barrier stays in its current location detaching them from their main source of income, their agricultaral lands.

ICAHD believes that international pressure on Israel is the key to ending the Occupation. In that vein, it can be used as an effective tool on specific smaller issues as well. With this in mind, we are embarking on a campaign to wield the power of our six thousands person international network by having you contact Israeli officials as well as your own representatives asking them to apply pressure to Israel. ICAHD will post a description of a fairly specific problem, background information, and a sample letter to be sent to the Israeli government and to one's own government. We will include the contact information for the proper Israeli officials but, given the diversity of our email list, we will depend on you to find the contact information for your own representatives.

If pressured to address specific issues we believe that it will make it more difficult for the Israeli government to hide behind the popular excuse of "security." Israel can assert that the "Security Barrier" is to avert terror attacks but, when broken down to specific examples of the location of the barrier, the excuse crumbles. Additionally, having up-to-date, specific information can help empower other activists in their own campaigns.

We anticipate sending out between one and four emails each week. Recognizing that not everyone has the time and inbox space, we are setting up a new listserve specifically for this campaign. To subscribe, send an email to icahdaction-subscribe (at) yahoogroups.com.

All of these emails will have background information, details about the situation and contact information for groups working on the broader issue. The Palestinian Environmental NGO Network's (PENGON) ongoing campaign against The Wall and our own campaign against home demolitions would be examples. We might send an Action Notice about something happening in Qalkilya but people interested in doing further work would be encouraged to contact groups like the Rhode Island-Qalkilya Alliance. We believe that if we frame this campaign of specifics in a broader context we can make a contribution to the efforts of groups already doing work on some of the issues we will address. This campaign is meant to compliment the grassroots solidarity, information and media campaigns that are already changing the way people see the conflict here.

Groups and individuals engaged in this issue are encouraged to submit ideas for action notices.

We at ICAHD thank everyone in advance for signing up and look forward to working with all of you in the struggle for peace and justice in the Middle East.
See also:
http://www.icahd.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/icahdaction

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Israel Halts Decades-Old Practice of Demolishing Militants' Homes
Current rating: 0
19 Feb 2005
JERUSALEM, Feb. 17 - Israel ordered a halt on Thursday to the policy of demolishing the homes of Palestinian militants, a step welcomed by Palestinian and human rights groups.

The decision by Israel's defense minister, Shaul Mofaz, suspends a practice that Israel has employed on and off for decades despite harsh international criticism of it as collective punishment.

A military statement did not say why the policy was being changed, but the newspaper Haaretz reported on its Web site that Maj. Gen. Udi Shani, who headed a committee reviewing the matter, had challenged the existing military position that demolitions were an effective deterrent. It said he had concluded that the policy had caused Israel more harm than good by generating hatred among the Palestinians.

A military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, offered a slightly different explanation, saying the demolitions were not regarded as necessary during a period of relative calm.

"House demolitions are just one measure of deterrence, and at present, it doesn't play the same role that it did previously," the military official said. "It's not something we consider necessary at this time."

Palestinians and human rights groups hailed the change.

"Finally the Israelis will stop destroying homes; this is good," said Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, a physician and human rights activist who finished second in last month's election for president of the Palestinian Authority. "This policy was counterproductive, and it was innocent people who were most often harmed."

Since the latest round of Israeli-Palestinian fighting began in September 2000, Israel has destroyed 675 Palestinian homes as punishment for Palestinian attacks, leaving 4,239 people homeless, according to the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem.

Typically, Israel has responded to a major Palestinian terror attack, like a suicide bombing, by sending armored bulldozers to flatten the house in which the bomber lived. The relatives of the bomber were sometimes given only a few minutes notice and would leave the home with only the items they could carry.

As the house demolitions became increasingly common, some Palestinian families, upon learning that a relative had been involved in a bombing, would not wait for a warning from the Israelis or the roar of bulldozers. They would begin racing to remove furniture and other contents from their home in the expectation that the military would arrive at any moment.

The Israeli move comes in the wake of the truce announced last week by Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon, and the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas.

Thursday's decision is in keeping with a series of good-will gestures recently announced by the two sides. But the Israeli military said the army's chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Moshe Yaalon, had ordered a military committee to review the house demolition policy four months ago.

At the committee's recommendation, Israel will "stop exercising the legal right to demolish terrorists' houses as a means of deterrence," the military said in a statement.

It added that the decision could be re-examined "if an extreme change in circumstances takes place."

Israeli security officials said there had been cases in which Palestinian fathers turned in their sons to the Israeli or Palestinian authorities to prevent the youths from carrying out attacks, which in turn would have resulted in Israel's demolition of the family home.

By employing a range of tough tactics and by building a security barrier inside parts of the West Bank, Israel's security forces have greatly reduced the number of Palestinian suicide bombings and other attacks since they peaked in 2002.

With Palestinians carrying out fewer attacks, Israel has been tearing down fewer homes in recent months.

Mr. Sharon pledged last week not to carry out military operations in the Palestinian areas as long as calm prevailed, a promise that might have been interpreted to include a halt to house demolitions.

Still, the Israeli announcement carries a great deal of symbolism.

Israel has destroyed nearly 2,500 Palestinian homes as punishment and deterrence since capturing the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, according to B'Tselem, the human rights group.

"It's a bittersweet victory, a confirmation of what we've been saying all along," said Rabbi Arik Ascherman, the head of Rabbis for Human Rights, referring to the report that the army had decided demolitions were ineffective as deterrents.

"There was never any substantial evidence that house demolitions provided a deterrent effect," he said. "It also seemed that they actually created more hatred and perhaps even the next generation of suicide bombers."

Israel stopped tearing down Palestinian homes as punishment for attacks after the two sides held peace talks following an interim peace agreement in 1993. But after the Palestinians launched their uprising in 2000, producing an unprecedented wave of suicide bombings, Israel resumed the practice.

Thursday's decision did not touch on other types of house demolitions.

In Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip along the border with Egypt, Palestinian gunmen and Israeli troops have waged almost daily gun battles in recent years.

Israel has torn down homes close to the border that the gunmen were using for cover, as well as houses that had weapons-smuggling tunnels linked to Egypt. Some 1,500 homes have been destroyed or rendered uninhabitable in Rafah, according to a survey conducted last year by Human Rights Watch, a group based in New York.

Also, Israel often levels Palestinian homes built without permits, which Palestinians say are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to obtain in places like East Jerusalem.

Rabbi Ascherman estimated that at least 80 Palestinian homes were torn down in Jerusalem last year because the builders did not have permits.


Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
http://www.nytimes.com