Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://127.0.0.1/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | View comments | Email this Article
News :: Miscellaneous
FRANKENFOODS IN YOUR TUMMY Current rating: 0
01 Mar 2001
CONTACT FDA IMMEDIATELY
DEMAND LABELLING OF GENETICALLY ALTERED FOODS


Send your emails to fdadockets (at) oc.fda.gov. In the subject line write
\"re: dockets 00N-1396 and OOD-1598,\"



FDA Commissioner Jane Henney
Dockets Management Branch (HFA 305)
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fisher\'s Lane, Room 1061
Rockville, MD 20852


We are in a potentially catastrophic situation. The introduction of untested, genetically modified organisms into the food supply is a risk that frankly, millions of Americans are not willing to take.

These \"foods\" must be labelled. They must be tested. We need comprehensive data that will tell us:

1) What particular modifications are in which crops.

2) A means of identifying trouble, warning people of dangers, and returning to the source of the genetically dangerous \"foods.\"

Your administration is responsible for safeguarding our food supplies. You must institute labelling and tracking of genetically modified products. We are not guinea pigs for corporations. We are American citizens with a right to know what we and our developing children are ingesting. Failure to act may later be seen as a crime against the health and welfare of the American people, tantamount to treason.

We have a right to know, and to buy or to not buy food based upon that knowledge.

Sincerely,
JG






===========================================
P A N U P S
Pesticide Action Network Updates Service
===========================================

Action Alert: Tell U.S. FDA to Test GE Food!

February 26, 2001

In the final days of the Clinton administration, the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) submitted its long awaited policy on
genetically engineered foods. In total disregard of consumer
concerns, the proposed policy will not require any pre-market safety
testing or labeling of genetically engineered (GE) food.

Instead, the FDA requires only that biotech food producers engage in
\"consultations\" with the agency and provide information on their
products. The information, which must be submitted only three months
before the product is marketed, will be posted on the Internet
during the agency\'s review. Some information may be kept secret,
however, if companies can demonstrate to FDA that it is confidential
business information or \"trade secrets.\" Industry studies that FDA
examines in its review of new products are not submitted for
scientific peer review and will not be available to the public.

FDA also proposed guidelines for a voluntary labeling system in
which companies labeling their products as \"GE-free\" or \"Non-GMO\"
bear the burden of certifying, testing and labeling their foods,
while companies that use GE ingredients do so without any
requirements to inform consumers through labeling.

Under the current U.S. regulatory framework, FDA has the authority
to regulate all GE food under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act. To date, however, FDA has not required any testing for the vast
majority of GE crops. Instead, companies producing GE crops can
voluntarily consult with FDA to confirm the regulatory status of
their products. Companies choosing to participate in the
consultation process are not required to conduct any standard set of
safety tests on their products. In fact, companies that have
voluntarily conducted safety studies only need to submit summaries
of those studies to the FDA. Because the FDA reviews only summaries,
not data, from safety studies, it does not publish conclusions on
the safety of individual GE foods.

The proposed rule will make this voluntary consultation process
mandatory, but no additional testing or data submission will be
required. FDA continues to maintain that GE crops are \"substantially
equivalent\" to crops bred using traditional methods, despite growing
evidence to the contrary. There is mounting scientific evidence of
potential health risks related to GE foods, such as allergic
responses, toxicity and lower nutritional value. Under FDA\'s new
notification rule, GE foods will continue to reach supermarket
shelves without any testing required for these health problems.

The public can comment on FDA\'s proposed policy until April 3, 2001.
Write to FDA Commissioner Jane Henney and tell her that you are
outraged that FDA continues to ignore the safety concerns of
consumers, doctors and scientists, in favor of protecting the
economic interests of biotech companies. Demand that FDA change its
policy to require labeling and pre-market safety testing of all
genetically engineered foods.

Send your emails to fdadockets (at) oc.fda.gov. In the subject line write
\"re: dockets 00N-1396 and OOD-1598,\" or send a letter referencing
the same dockets to:

FDA Commissioner Jane Henney
Dockets Management Branch (HFA 305)
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fisher\'s Lane, Room 1061
Rockville, MD 20852

For an overview of GE crops and foods, see PANNA\'s online
presentation at:
http://www.panna.org/panna/resources/geTutorial.html.

For a thorough analysis of the proposed rule, visit the Center for
Food Safety Web site: http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org.

For the full text of the FDA proposed rules, visit:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/oc/ohrms/advdisplay.cfm.

For an overview of U.S. regulation of GE crops, visit the Union of
Concerned Scientists Web site:
http://www.uscusa.org/food/gen.policy.html.

Source/contact: PANNA.

PANUPS is a weekly email news service providing resource guides and
reporting on pesticide issues that don\'t always get coverage by the
mainstream media. It\'s produced by Pesticide Action Network North
America, a non-profit and non-governmental organization working to
advance sustainable alternatives to pesticides worldwide.

You can join our efforts! We gladly accept donations for our work
and all contributions are tax deductible in the United States. Visit
our extensive web site at http://www.panna.org to learn more about
getting involved.

===========================================
NOTE: Replies to the sender of this message
will not be read.

To comment, send a message to:
panna (at) panna.org

To subscribe, send a blank message to:
panups-subscribe (at) igc.topica.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
panups-unsubscribe (at) igc.topica.com

Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA)
49 Powell St., Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94102 USA
Phone: (415) 981-1771
Fax: (415) 981-1991
Email: panna (at) panna.org
Web: http://www.panna.org
===========================================


Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Go Organic
Current rating: 0
02 Mar 2001
Since labelling of GM foods is not being allowed, buying organic foods is probably the best way to ensure that one is not ingesting the freaky stuff. It is a crime not to label food as GM - the government is basically forcing people to eat it, not leaving too many choices available to buyers. People with low incomes are the ones who are being experimented upon - they cannot afford to buy organic foods - I would like to see a list of what foods the white house serves to Mr Bush - I think it a good chance it is all organic, with no GM's allowed.