|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
Satterthwaite v. Prussing |
Current rating: 0 |
by gehrig
(No verified email address) |
18 Nov 2004
|
|
A visual comment. Use as needed. |
|
|
@%< |
This work is in the public domain |
|
Spread the truth |
by M R
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
18 Nov 2004
|
 |
 tod-I\'vegotpeoplefooled.pdf (484 k) |
|
pdf is a large, hi-rez version of the jpg |
|
Re: Satterthwaite v. Prussing |
by anon
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
18 Nov 2004
|
|
LAUREL
LAUREL
LAUREL
WACKO
WACKO
WACKO
Come on, think about what he HAS done people.
|
|
Re: Satterthwaite v. Prussing |
by anon
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
18 Nov 2004
|
|
you could be living in champaign... |
|
More truth |
by M R
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
18 Nov 2004
|
 |
| tod-iwonttoleratedissent.pdf (484 k) |
|
only a sustained campaign will oust the tool. |
|
Re: Satterthwaite v. Prussing |
by gehrig
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
19 Nov 2004
|
I _am_ thinking about what he's done, and that's why I'm going to work to get him defeated.
@%< |
|
Re: Satterthwaite v. Prussing |
by anon
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
19 Nov 2004
|
"I'll hurt Urbana to hurt my enemies" is a great one!
Nice work on the poster designs here! Gawd I... dislike power-hungry, egomaniacal bureaucrats. "Public servant" my azz. He is (or was) not much more than a bar owner in a college town, it would seem.
What a tool. You can boot his obstructionist butt out in May '05, right (?) Who will he likely be running against?
http://www.city.urbana.il.us/urbana/mayor/mayor_about.html |
|
Re: Satterthwaite v. Prussing |
by the
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
21 Nov 2004
|
The issue at hand is ONLY about Tool Satterthwaite preventing the airing of a popular progressive TV show that many in the community have asked to see. There is no real reason not to proceed, and air it.
A pure, bureaucratic abuse of (citizen-granted) power. It's clearly "personal", with this jerk. His "supreme" power was challenged, and so he's done everything he can to reassert it, pulling every underhanded and ego-driven trick in the book.
Hubris will be his downfall - history is a fair teacher.
As usual, none of "Jack's" baiting Limbaugh-esque drivel has anything to do with the reality at hand. Surprise.
Sorry for feedin' the troll, everybody. |
