|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
|
|
THE PORTRAIT OF THE MODERN "DISTINGUISHED" POLITICIAN |
Current rating: 0 |
by Anna Epelbaum
Email: aepelbaum (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified!)
Phone: (217) 359-3619
Address: 302 S. Second St., #711 |
14 Sep 2004
|
|
I want very much the victory of Democratic ticket in this oncoming election. I also think that even Bush and Cheney both together want less to be elected than Clintons want them to. At that point, and at some other also, I think that now it is the good time to place here one picture, which I pulled from Internet, and two of my poems |
The Most Effective Modern Tool of Mass Distraction (In USA Senate)
The husband was ashamed before the whole world!
The daughter's drunkard, can't live without drugs.
One can't, of course, find anywhere abroad
The better tool than in the USA senate.
The relatives of Oklahoma victims,
Who still in dreams see their dears' blood,
For criminal, who should be brought to justice,
You could look for in USA senate.
The former mates-state republicans-in ruins.
The latest friends-top democrats - in mud !
For the most effective tool of mass distraction
One, sure, should look in USA senate!
The former colleagues of Rose firm - in prison.
Survivors - few, majority - in tombs.
And victims of the latest provocation
Should seek revenge in USA senate.
The Jewish victims like last-Winona Ryder,
Who're used to turn us to former times' tenet,
If you're in search of provocation's guidance,
Look for the source in USA senate !
The country's welfare's almost in ruins,
Free speech and liberties're almost shut up !
Who’re interested in roots of this occurrence
Start look for them in USA senate !
The dinosaurs are subject of the science,
And children love to watch Jurassic Park.
But it is wiser to have bones in museums,
Than have live one in USA senate !
One Difference Between the USA Democracy and the UK Royalty
This is the part II of the previous poem - 'In USA Senate'
The late princess Diana was shroud,
And had very high of her love life's speed.
So, now princes can easily become moot,
If they are proven to be not royal seed.
But the USA is much liberal, for sure,
Chelsea isn't similar to Bill, although
There were some surgeries to cure,
Differences are still clear, even more.
So, to understand better the meaning
Of word 'whore' or the short, bright word -........
One needs not to search dictionaries really,
But to visit the USA Senate! |
This work is in the public domain |
|
Re: THE PORTRAIT OF THE MODERN "DISTINGUISHED" POLITICIAN |
by Anna Epelbaum
aepelbaum (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
18 Sep 2004
|
This is the answer to the hidden comment of Jack Ryan.
I, the same way as my husband-Wayne Pickette, whom you have communicated, as I know, is in very bad financial shape right now, and under the terrible pressure from above. I am appreciating therefore ANY publishing media forum, which I can obtain.
The question about my political and voting choices isn't simple to answer in full. Currently, however, I am voting Bush out. I had run from left radicalism only to find out through experience that right radicalism is
even worse. If you really want to know my opinions and vision about political and economical structures and corresponding tendencies of world's development, I suggest you should purchase English version of my book "Moscow -Chicago, Further Everywhere" on my web site and read it http://www.moscowtochicago.com. It is not there yet in its English version. Russian version is already available there and electronic copy costs $11. 95. English version would be available in three weeks-four weeks at maximum, I think..
About my current political choices again: I want Bush out after he has demonstrated the complete unfit for his job, and the very dangerous unfit as well. Kerry is the only real alternative to vote him out (I don't trust any revolution), and Kerry is not the very bad alternative either, as he is moderate, and I am also having moderate political views. |
|
Re: THE PORTRAIT OF THE MODERN "DISTINGUISHED" POLITICIAN |
by Anna Epelbaum
aepelbaum (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
19 Sep 2004
|
Dear editors, I didn't place the comment #3. What is wrong with you, this site editors?
What do you want from me and my publications? Why are you creating idiotic comments under my name? And why are you hiding so many comments? Who gave you rights to do all that? |
|
We Do Our Best |
by ML
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
19 Sep 2004
|
Anna,
We do our best to identify and hide faked stories here. Please don't feed the trolls by responding to them here. You can simply send an email to imc-web (at) ucimc.org if you notice faked comments in your name. I have hidden the faked comment and changed the authorship so that it identifies the real culprit. |
