|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
News :: Civil & Human Rights : Government Secrecy : Labor : Political-Economy |
|
U.S. jobless rate misses "hidden" unemployed |
Current rating: 0 |
by Reuters
(No verified email address) |
16 Jun 2004
|
|
The Bush Administration has been doing its best to promote recent incremental increases in employment statistics as proof that its economic polcies are finally bearing fruit. After all, they have an election they hope to win. The reality is that many Americans still cannot find work and that many of those who do find it cannot support their families on the meager wages paid in the service sector, where the limited growth in employment that is taking place is concentrated. A nearly 10% unemployment rate is nothing to brag about and actually represents the dismal failure of capitalism to deliver on its oft repeated promises. |
NEW YORK -- Buried inside the official U.S. employment report each month is a little-known figure that gives a much less rosy picture of the labor market than the headlines.
The government agency that produces the data also publishes an alternative measure that tries to capture the hidden unemployed, those who are not included in the official unemployment rate for various statistical reasons.
That broader measure is dramatically higher, at 9.7 percent in May, compared with the official level of 5.6 percent.
That's an extra 5.96 million people, in addition to the 8.2 million "officially" unemployed, who are waiting on the sidelines and may at some point step back into the labor force.
Although it receives little notice, the adjusted jobless rate has important implications for Federal Reserve policy-makers because it suggests the job market will not tighten as quickly as some in the financial markets believe.
"It shows there is more slack in the labor market than appears on the surface and as job opportunities improve, we'll see people re-entering the labor force to search for work," said former Fed Governor Lyle Gramley.
"That means fears that inflation is about break out all over the place do not seem warranted," he said in an interview.
The Federal Reserve is widely expected to start raising interest rates later this month, as the economy recovers from the 2001 recession and job creation picks up. But the Fed can boost rates at a slower pace if inflation is not a big threat.
DISCOURAGED WORKERS
The Labor Department's adjusted measure of unemployment adds in people it describes as "marginally attached" to the labor force. These are workers who have not actively looked for work in the past four weeks, including "discouraged workers" who have given up altogether. They also include those who have given up looking for full-time jobs and have settled for part-time work instead.
None of the unemployment measures include the 1.7 percent of the male wage-earning population who are in prison, or another 1.36 million men, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
"We have had this unprecedented withdrawal from the labor force over the past three years," said Lee Price, research director at the independent Economic Policy Institute. "The traditional measure of labor market slack, the unemployment rate, is giving us a misleadingly tight picture."
Indeed, the labor force participation rate is at its lowest level since 1988 -- lower even than in the last recession.
Financial markets and private-sector economists pay little attention to the alternative measure of joblessness, and a search of the Federal Reserve's entire database of research turned up only two articles on the topic.
The author of one of those papers, economist Yolanda Kodrzycki at the Boston Fed, said the broader measure is "very helpful," although it tends to move in tandem with the official rate.
On Wall street, analysts generally hold upbeat views on the economy and accept the unemployment rate at face value, said HSBC Chief Economist Ian Morris. "There is a whole debate to be had on unemployment, but it's not happening," he said.
The adjusted measure shows "unemployment remains stubbornly high and higher than it should be at this point in the cycle," said Jose Rasco, senior economist at Merrill Lynch.
Federal Reserve officials seem to be aware of the limits of the reported unemployment rate.
Fed Governor Donald Kohn noted in a speech last week that many people who left the work force because of poor prospects are probably ready to rejoin the market.
"If that is correct, then the current level of the unemployment rate ... may, if anything, understate the availability of labor resources," Kohn said.
The return of the uncounted into the work force will also slow the improvement in the official rate, and could actually send it higher, even as new jobs are being created. |
Copyright by the author. All rights reserved. |
|
Re: U.S. jobless rate misses "hidden" unemployed |
by NRA4Freedom
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
17 Jun 2004
|
|
No question about it, "official unemployment figures" are statistics that may not truly or fully reflect the whole story. But then, during the 8 years of Clinton Gore, the same "official unemployment figures" were handed out by that administration, and I didn't notice anyone claiming that they were skewed or incorrect because of this or that. So this article is nothing but the typical anti-gop propaganda apparently. Sort of like the whole homeless people thing...no one heard about anyone being "homeless" the whole time Clinton was in office, but when Bush replaced him, all of a sudden now people are supposedly homeless again... |
|
You Can't Have It Both Ways |
by Dose of Reality
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
17 Jun 2004
|
Every time there is the least little bit of good economic news in these times of generally cheerless events for working Americans, Bush or some member of his team jumps in front of the cameras to claim credit for it. Yet, whenever there's bad news (and most of it is for workers, even if Bush's class is raking in big bucks from his unpaid-for tax cuts) there's someone like NRA4 claiming that's not Bush's responsibility.
Sorry, you can't have it both ways.
BTW, Indymedia was founded near the end of Clinton's term, but news and comments on it then were relentlessly critical of him. Your claim that this is just a partisan dig at Bush ring hollow. Kerry is catching his own share of flack on Indymedia; if you weren't blinded by your own partisanship, drawing happy faces on bad news for the Bush team, you might have noticed that. We really don't care which capitalist is in charge. The system still sucks for most working Americans. |
|
Re: U.S. jobless rate misses "hidden" unemployed |
by NRA4Freedom
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
17 Jun 2004
|
Dose,
>"The system still sucks for most working Americans."
So, what's the alternative? Please clearly outline your plan for working America... |
|
Still Thinking, But Some of This Looks Good |
by Dose of Reality
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
17 Jun 2004
|
I have no crystal ball to tell which exact combination of policy would work best, but here's some links to some info that I can support as presenting credible and reasonable alternatives to corporate capitalism:
http://www.gp.org/platform_index.html
http://sp-usa.org/about/platform.html
http://www.cofc.org/htm/socialis.htm
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/apr2004/stat-a28.shtml |
|
Re: U.S. jobless rate misses "hidden" unemployed |
by NRA4Freedom
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
18 Jun 2004
|
>"I have no crystal ball to tell which exact combination of policy would work best..."
Wow, real honest truth! Refreshing!
>"...but here's some links to some info that I can support as presenting credible and reasonable alternatives to corporate capitalism:
http://www.gp.org/platform_index.html
http://sp-usa.org/about/platform.html
http://www.cofc.org/htm/socialis.htm
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/apr2004/stat-a28.shtml
Ummmm...all you can think of to come up with to help the American worker is one link to the "green party" and 3 links to socialism??? You are living in the wrong Country fella...there cannot possibly be anything about the United States that you like, except freedom to speak perhaps. Please name a socialist Country that you believe the United States would do well to emulate and could you list maybe 10 reasons why you would rather live there than here... |
