Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://127.0.0.1/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | View comments | Email this Article
News :: Miscellaneous
CONSUMERS DON'T BUY WAL-MART RAP ON GASOLINE LAW Current rating: 0
06 Aug 2001
One more instance where so-called "free trade" will harm the consumer.
As we reported in recent issues of this Bulletin, Wal-Mart is lobbying several state legislatures to repeal laws that bar below-cost sales of gasoline. Wal-Mart is installing gas stations in the parking lots of hundreds of its superstores. By selling gas below its wholesale cost, Wal-Mart hopes to draw shoppers into its stores and eliminate independent competitors. The problem is, many states have laws that require retailers to sell gas at a minimum mark-up.

Wal-Mart wants these laws repealed and argues that they prevent consumers from getting the lowest possible price. It's an argument that has won over many state lawmakers, but, according to a recent Wisconsin poll, most voters are buying it. The survey was conducted by the Petroleum Marketers of Wisconsin, a gas station trade association. It found that 69 percent of consumers support the law and believe it preserves fair competition. More than 70 percent said that, without the law, large chains would drive independent stations out of business.

A measure to repeal the law had made it into the Wisconsin legislature's budget bill, but following the poll's release in late July, it was quietly dropped.

¨ Back issues of this newsletter: http://www.newrules.org/hta/index.htm

This originally appeared in The Home Town Advantage Bulletin (http://www.newrules.org/hta/index.htm), a bimonthly email newsletter from the New Rules Project (http://www.newrules.org) of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
See also:
http://www.newrules.org/hta/index.htm
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

you fucked up your story
Current rating: 0
06 Aug 2001
it's aren't buying it, not are buying it. that one word completely fucks up the story. watch it, y'all.
you fucked up your story
Current rating: 0
06 Aug 2001
it's aren't buying it, not are buying it. that one word completely fucks up the story. watch it, y'all.
How about some constructive critizism?
Current rating: 0
07 Aug 2001
Responding to the comment above as one who's grammatically and spellin impaired, its bad enough to make a mistake and publish it, but we certainly don't need some "Grammer Queen" using F**king language to discourage writers. Which is how I would feel if I wrote that article and read your comment. If you really don't want someone to make a mistake again how about using some politeness? Politely pointing out the mistake while encouraging future reporting. We're truely a grassroots organization and we need all the help we can get; we need to encourage each other, not tear each other down.

By the way excellent article.

Despite the media focusing on how bad "Big Government" is, small business should realise that they need government to protect them from the big companies.

(in solidarity I didn't proof-read this)