|
Comment on this article |
View comments |
Email this Article
|
|
Announcement :: Elections & Legislation |
|
Is Urbaszewski Planning Another Run For Congress? |
Current rating: -1 |
by Tina McComb
(No verified email address) |
04 Dec 2003
|
|
G. Urbaszewski, a former acolyte of Saul Alinsky, is rumored to be contemplating another run for Congress, as a Republican. |
Eugene "Gene" Urbaszewski, a former acolyte of radical activist Saul Alinsky, is rumored to be preparing for another run for the Republican nomination for U.S. House in Illinois 5, a working class neighborhood in Chicago.
A relation of the funeral home proprietor Urbaszewski family in Chicago, Urbaszewski failed last time, in 2002, in his bid for GOP nomination.
Currently under an agreed order from the Circuit Court of Cook County for harassment, Urbaszewski has a somewhat unconventional approach to electoral politics, apparently based on Alinsky's famous tome, Rules for Radical, which was dedicated to the devil. |
See also:
http://www.urbaszewski.com
|
|
Re: Is Urbaszewski Planning Another Run For Congress? |
by Terry Urbaszewski
Terryurba (nospam) aol.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 3
26 Dec 2003
Modified: 04:04:00 AM |
I don't know who Tina McComb is but I have some ideas. (I suspect another alias of a former harrasser.) She terribly needs to do her homework before spreading false rumors. Eugene R. Urbaszewski is my husband and he is not running for any political office; he is not a former "acolyte" of Saul Alinsky; he and I were the harrassed not the harrassers.The CIRCUIT COURT AGREED ORDER was that the alleged HARRASSER WOULD HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH MY HUSBAND and vice versa. The District Attorney was pressing charges against the alleged harrasser. He would have been found guilty if the police report was done with proper charges. I wonder if the alleged harrasser is breaking his agreement
with the court? Where do you get your "rumors"???
Maybe you should read Rules for Radicals and find out why it was dedicated to the devil. You really don't know what you are talking about.
|
