Comment on this article |
Email this Article
|
Hidden with code "Submitted as Feature" |
News :: Health |
Are Physicians Leaving Illinois for Other States? |
Current rating: 0 |
by John Hilty Email: jhilty (nospam) shout.net (unverified!) |
18 Jul 2005
|
During the past year, some physician groups and health insurance officials have stated that physicians are leaving Illinois for other states because of the high cost of medical malpractice insurance. However, an analysis of data from the American Medical Association and the U.S. Census Bureau reveals that this isn't true. |
Some physician groups and health insurance officials have made the
claim that practicing physicians are leaving Illinois for other states that
have lower medical malpractice premiums – particularly Wisconsin and
Indiana. This claim has been published in various newspaper articles and local
news programs throughout the state during the past year. A typical example of
this type of article can be found in the News-Gazette, "Malpractice Forums Talk
about Reform," which was published earlier this year (March 5, 2005). This
claim was part of an attempt by physician groups and health insurance officials
to convince members of the public and the Illinois state legislature that caps
should be placed on jury awards in medical practice cases. Otherwise, they
asserted, the cost of medical malpractice premiums would spiral out of control
and physicians would leave the state in droves.
As a result of this
publicity and their lobbying efforts, these physician groups and the health
insurance industry were successful in convincing the state legislature to pass
a law that places a $500,000 cap on jury awards in medical malpractice cases.
However, is it really true that physicians were leaving Illinois and becoming more scarce? This claim is easy to evaluate because the
American Medical Association (AMA) publishes the number of patient care
physicians in each state, while the U.S. Census Bureau publishes the population
of each state. By dividing the number of patient care physicians by a state's
population in a given year, it is possible to estimate the per capita supply of
such physicians in different states.
The table below displays the
patient care physician to population ratios for the USA, Illinois, Indiana, and
Wisconsin from 1991 to 2003.
Patient
Care Physician to
Population Ratios |
Year |
USA |
Illinois |
Indiana |
Wisconsin |
1991 |
1:502 |
1:499 |
1:668 |
1:567 |
1993 |
1:485 |
1:478 |
1:639 |
1:545 |
1995 |
1:466 |
1:456 |
1:601 |
1:517 |
1997 |
1:444 |
1:433 |
1:562 |
1:485 |
1999 |
1:447 |
1:437 |
1:565 |
1:484 |
2001 |
1:437 |
1:430 |
1:537 |
1:465 |
2003 |
1:421 |
1:418 |
1:508 |
1:438 |
For example, 1:502 in the USA column
means that there was one patient care physician for every 502 persons in the
USA during 1991. Sources: Physician Characteristics
and Distribution in the US, 1993-2005
Editions, American Medical Association; U.S. Census Bureau
|
From this table, it is clear that the per capita supply of patient
care physicians has increased during this time period in the United States and
all three states. Thus, patient care physicians are not leaving Illinois in
droves and becoming more scarce. On a per capita basis, the percentage change
in patient care physicians from 1991 to 2003 was +19.2% for the USA, +19.4% in
Illinois, +31.% in Indiana, and +29.5% in Wisconsin. It seems likely that these
increases have been driven in part by the high incomes of physicians in the
United States, which attracts immigrants from abroad with medical degrees. The
per capita supply of patient care physicians in Wisconsin and Indiana has
increased to a greater extent than in Illinois and the nation generally, which
may be the result of the below-average costs for medical malpractice insurance
in these two states.
Even though the costs of medical malpractice
insurance are above average in Illinois, this state has managed to keep pace
with the rest of the nation in its per capita supply of patient care
physicians. Contrary to the claims of some physician groups and health
insurance officials, there is no crisis in the supply of physicians within the
state. Thus, this aspect of their argument for caps on jury awards in medical
liability cases appears to be an inappropriate scare
tactic.
|
This work is in the public domain |