|
Parent Article: Statement Of Clarification And Apology |
|
Hidden with code "Policy Violation" |
|
Re: Statement Of Clarification And Apology |
by interesting
(No verified email address) |
Current rating: 0
30 Jun 2005
|
|
I 've read this string of comments and I can't figure out if ucimc is also forcing any sexuality it, itself, prefer on everybody. 'I agree' claims to be heterosexual (as I am) and hates all attempts of homosexual activities. La Ley accuses him of being not "progressive" and against the main stream of ucimc. Is it now like the reversed racism: everybody is required to be homosexual ? I respect rights of any sexuality, but , like 'I agree', I would knock down any male who would try to do me without my consent and against my sexuality. What to the hell is going on with these feminists rulers of ucimc? If they think that they are allowed EVERYTHING because they are females, they should think again! I think that any normal person with self-respect would need a restraining order against each one, and all of them. I am no 'noble knight', though, and I would treat them like I treat males in similar circumstances. These bitches got power and now are fully crazy! "Umbrella", Ha! |
