|
Parent Article: ADMINSTRATOR FAILS TO BRING INMATE PHONE CONTRACT TO COUNTY BOARD |
|
Hidden with code "Policy Violation" |
|
Re: ADMINSTRATOR FAILS TO BRING INMATE PHONE CONTRACT TO COUNTY BOARD |
by Anna Epelbaum
aepelbaum (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
17 Jan 2005
|
Dear Disgusted, my postings are always, maybe, with 1-2% percent of doubtful exception, directly ON TOPIC!!.
The way of communication when people delete and falsified answers of opponent(s) is nothing less that the way of treatment in concentration camps of Nazi Germany, and these are the methods of so named dialogs, which this web is producing., utilizing together the efforts of its "loyal" providers and 'loyal' editorial staff.
By all these methods IMC is destroying the moral values, and the general attitude of this society, especially, its young generation.
This is everyone's business. People, like me, who are teachers by choice and by the long experience, can't stay away of it and watch this kind of terrible degradation of the spirit of this society, which IMC is actively promoting and inflicting.
Below in quotas one of my numerous hidden and deleted comment. This one is very much 'ON TOPIC' and answers the questions of 'Ley Lay', which he/she preferred later to claim as unanswered. It also illustrates activities of IMC leading members:
“
FIRST OF ALL, ‘Ley Lay’ I found out about this web site one year ago exactly, when the leaders of this web published here without my CONSENT AND KNOWLEDGE my e-mails to them after they instead of the interview , which I and my husband prepared for them, recorded his monologue for about two hours and then not only refused to make use of it, but, as usually, blamed it on me and him.
So, that is about "publication without consent". SECOND, Sandra NEVER EVER refused to make segments about my husband. At the time of the story above Clint Popetz, not her, had been in charge of the radio channel.
As a matter of fact, when this fall she was out for a while, some people (I think with her consent, and even inspiration) ASKED us to make radio segment at her time. It was more than half of the year later, and I and Wayne DIDN'T WANT to use radio CHANNEL of IMC any more. THIRD, IT WAS NOT slandering either Sandra, or her family. I gave the TRUTHFUL information about her insensitive to create the movement, which should benefit her (all right, it was not so terribly important to me), but simultaneously this movement is promoting CRIME activities, showing that inmates should have better treatment than regular law obedient people, and this movement should place the burden of additional payment on the shoulders of these obedient tax payers. I agree FULLY AND COMPLETELY with 'Confused and Puzzled' on these issues.
The information about Sandra’s family problem I received from the comment of 'Confused'. Maybe, it is the same person. I don't know, as there is a lot of people, who completely disagreed with a lot of IMC policies, but don't want to reveal their identities. I am an exception, and that is why I am terribly MISTREATED.
I don't think even a bit that I "slander" Sandra. Besides, your leading members were and are allowing themselves much worse treatment of me and/or my family (read my article Happy New Year...., and the thread of comments to it). Who , to the hell , gave them rights to do it, and have their comments maintained, which means that IMC is PROMOTING such kind of ideology as White Supremacy, etc..
I reveal the reason why she(Sandra) is promoting IDEOLOGICALLY WRONG activities.
“
If you have not understood yet that I am not playing any game here, that I am not interested in any personal relation with any of your so named “leaders”, that this is no “soap opera”, etc.., then you have a very strange way of the comprehension or pretend (more realistic guess) to have the one.
I AM ON THIS WEB BECAUSE IMC IS CURRENTLY THE CENTER TO DISSEMINATE THE HEAVIEST MORAL AND SPIRITUAL INFECTIONS AMONG THIS NEIGHBORHOOD’S YOUNG GENERATION.
I am 100% percent sure that I have made NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT. |
