|
Parent Article: Should you trust the NWS predictions? |
|
Hidden with code "Duplicate post" |
|
Should you trust the "telling it like it is(not)"? |
by Peter K Anderson
hartlod (nospam) bigpond.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
17 Mar 2006
|
Truly "telling it like it is(not)" if you look at the thread mentioned you will find that one Pat N. and Gavin S. begin a thread specifically attempting to belittle myself.
It was not until after i was told of that threads existence I even went to that thread. This can be seen in the DATES of the posts.
You see 'telling as it is(not)" you overlook the WHEN, and so your OPINIONS relate a FABRICATION of events to suit 'your' purpose perhaps, but are not at all correlated to REALITY.
That there are 'communally used identities' is attested in a 'spoiler attempt' by one 'CH' that is made from behind at least on 'free yahoo account', but used by more than one 'individual'. The 'labeled identity' has remained the same even when differing mail accounts are used.
You should also realise 'telling it like it is(not)' that after being informed of the actions of Pat N. and Gavin S., the next thing I did AFTER commenting in that particular thread was look for others by title, firstly within the particular 'service' that Pat N. was (ab)using, then after finding a few 'titles', used Google to associate those titles with both 'Pat Neuman' and 'Gavin Smith' (some have provided an alternative spelling of Gavin's surname but i have not bothered to search further).
There are multiple copies of near all of Pat N.'s titles, from 30 to over 500. Asking WHY such would be done, i was informed that there is behavior suggestive of attempting to 'build a platform' by Pat N. with Pat N. being 'raised up upon it'.
As you are again anonymous 'telling it is(not)" I do believe that you are either Pat N. or Gavin Smith still, and as so far the only persons IN this thread are Pat N and myself, it would seem more likely to be Pat N. trying to 'hide' again.
I am only here as it seems Pat N. is still trying to make much of nothing, which is all that has ever been at the basis of 'his opinion', and this seemed a good place to speak directly to 'Pat N.' 'in private' as i do not see many others being even aware this 'thread' exists.
I only found it whilst looking into fiscal scams involving the garnering of DONATIONS to supposedly aid 'Polar Bears' from 'melting ice'. It seems 'flim-flam' is rife within the motives of many presenting 'environmental concern'. FRAUD is still a criminal offense, regardless of 'presented motive'.
Is it "telling it like it is(not)", that you are perhaps worried your cash flow might be restricted if people generally become aware of the SCAMMING being done under the guise of "environmental concern"? The posts for such are often seen in YAHOO with links to other places. I have provided one such already, which lead me to other posts with the same title, one made by Pat N. to which I replied with a general response and NO reference to Pat N.
Then the 'hate hartlod threads' began, as linked. YOU see "telling it like it is(not)" the WHEN is not something YOU can ignore.
As I do believe you have already been TOLD as to details behind my 'TRADEMARK ' I shall be brief.
The word 'hartlod' has been my 'net name' since university, before the internet and even before 'personal computers'. It has been associated with ME now for over 20 years, nearer to 25 years now. It was used with some KNOWNING that it was I (Peter K Anderson) behind the 'label of 'hartlod' when it was generally NOT to be known WHO the individual was involved in the 'task at hand'.
As I have been ill for over a decade now, it was a way of 'RETIRING' the label, by making a PUBLIC, direct and LEGAL link to said label with me (Peter K Anderson) obvious. I do not think I will need to be anonymous again.
Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod (at) bigpond.com
With sparse regard to:-
-----
"telling it like it is"
(No verified email address)
Current rating: 0
17 Mar 2006
-----
With various comments made within "Should you trust the NWS predictions?" |
