Cherry blossoms bulletin board management committee all of you and cherry
blossoms bulletin board contributor all of you
There is a person who repeats a person who repeats the ruining remark and an irresponsible thread setting up ruining on the
free discussion bulletin board now needless to say now.
It proposed the deletion of the remark without the establishment preparation room's changing the bulletin board system,
and making a thread concerned dirty or it came to be able to propose the movement of the thread to garbage Hacoita,
writing by ruining became quiet at one o'clock, and it seemed the other day.
However, the appearance to which the ruining act escalates again for these several days is shown. In addition,
the means seems not to be chosen.
This ruining that repeats the writing swindles others' HN, fuels hostility toward another country,
is not well-grounded, ridicules Japan, and ..gracious.. : a thread setting up by a miserable remark and writing and Japan
that the connection and is vulgar. It slanders, there is no attachment to the culture of about Japan and Japan, and
it seems to consider the idea of the channel cherry blossoms that start starting at last to be a way by making
the cherry blossoms bulletin board dirty.
As the assumption though the thing whose the act is a ruining act is ascertained to oppose these ruining acts,
and it is needed to propose the movement and the deletion by the movement proposal thread
It is thought that enumerating, and observing the thread and the remark assumed to be
"Isn't it a ruining act?" as "Doubt report" are necessary. In this case, keeping covering all threads and observing
it are serious only in each effort.
I would like you to report on the remark and the thread with the doubt in this thread ,
saying that "Isn't it a ruining act?".
It thinks whether lead to a constant warning to the lack of the person and calm that putting the speaker's
concerned remark based on the report under many calm watches of everybody does the ruining act and doing an unsightly remark.
Moreover, the place where it explains the remark of the person who makes remarks on concerned and
the place that restores honor according to circumstances are needed at the stage before the deletion of the remark is proposed, too.
It is thought that such a doubt can be dispelled by this thread with the remark actually
done though it is thought that never lead to ridicule and the label pasting the individual.
Japanese right-wing site [sakura]
http://www.ch-sakura.jp/bbs_thread.php?ID=55743&GENRE=unei |