Special
Issue: Perspectives on Terror Tuesday
by John Wasson
Prior to September 11, we of the public i had a more
mundane and diversified edition in mind. But the intervening
events of that unforgettable day have of necessity caused
a much different version to emerge. Although literally
billions of words have already been spoken and written
about those horrific incidents and their aftermath,
and billions more will doubtless be uttered, we crave
your indulgence as we present what we hope will be a
slightly different perspective from that to which you
have been exposed to the point of exhaustion.
Some of you reading this issue will agree with everything
that is said in these pages. But others of you may find
many of our words disturbing, dissonant, perhaps even
somewhat unpatriotic or insufficiently reverent to the
victims of the tragedy or their survivors.
If the latter is your reaction, we are deeply and sincerely
sorry. But we feel that we must be true to our consciences
and convictions, our mission, our very reason for being.
While we, too, love our country deeply, what we love
more are the principlesand ideals from which our country
claims to draw its strength and moral imperative, but
from which we feel it has in many ways strayed. In our
short existence as the public i, we have tried to be,
and we will continue to try to be, a voice calling America
back to those fundamental and precious principles.
Some of us here at the Independent Media Center, and
some of you reading this, lived through the era of the
Viet Nam war. There was disagreement back then, too
- often extremely vociferous disagreement - about what
our nation should and should not do. There was protest
- deeply impassioned protest - against the policies
of our government. Now, with the hindsight of 30 years,
the vast majority of Americans (including the leading
Army general of the era) agree that it was an unjust
and ill-advised war, fought in the wrong place at the
wrong time forthe wrong reasons.
Back then the proponents of the war had their slogans.
One of them was "Right or wrong, my country!"
Those of us who took the trouble to research the origins
of the slogan discovered, however, that it had been
taken out of context. The full text of the original
statement read instead: "Right or wrong, my country.
If it's right, keep it right. If it's wrong, MAKE it
right."
We believe, as you will discover from reading the contents
of this issue, that the leaders of our nation are exploiting
our emotional vulnerability to lead us down a grievously
wrong and treacherous path. Full-scale war for the purpose
of vengeance against an entire culture or continent
of people, and wholesale curtailment of our civil liberties
here at home, all under the guise of "rooting out
terrorists and those who harbor them", is in no
way the proper response to the tragedy of September
11, not even in contemplation or as a rhetorical device.
When our President says on national television, "You're
either with us or with the terrorists," some of
us honestly feel schizophrenic. Why? Because all too
often historically, and right down to the present moment,
Americans have themselves been the terrorists. This
is the part of the story you're not hearing in the mainstream
media.
While a criminal trial in a world tribunal of justice
may be entirely appropriate for the actual direct accomplices
of those who perpetrated the September 11 atrocity,
should they be apprehended, we must at the same time
sincerely examine the military andeconomic injustices
our own country and its institutions routinely perpetrate
against other nations and peoples on a daily basis.
If we do not, we will remain trapped in an ever-escalating
spiral of mutually destructive "terrorism"
that is largely of America's own making.
Some of you who take the trouble to read our words
will find them deeply disturbing. But 30 years from
now, if you are alive to remember them, you may find
them chillingly prophetic.
|