More
About Sweatshops, and the Organizations Who Fight Them
by John Wason
Since the feature article was written,
three young female workers from garment factories
in Bangladesh have arrived in the United States and
have begun a month-long speaking tourof at least 19
colleges and universities, under the sponsorship of
the National Labor Committee. They are accompanied
on their tour by a translator and by Charles Kernaghan,
Executive Director of the NLC. The group spoke twice
in Bloomington-Normal on October 26, once on the Illinois
State University campus and later at the Laborer's
Hall in Bloomington.
National Labor Committee
The National Labor Committee is one
of several organizations that are concerned with issues
of human rights abuses as they relate to workers around
the world. The NLC serves a primarily educational,
consciousness-raising function. On its web site (www.nlcnet.org)
can be found a variety of thought provoking and emotionally
riveting reports on sweatshop issues in a number of
'developing' countries. There is a link to "Wages
Around the World: How Much Do Apparel Workers Make?",
which compares the average base wage of a garment
manufacturing worker in the US to that of her counterparts
in 20 other nations.
Another of the NLC's web pages, entitled
"Resources and Reports", allows you to follow
links to information organized by country (American
Samoa, Bangladesh, Burma, China, El Salvador, Haiti,
Honduras, and Nicaragua are currently listed) or by
company (including Wal-Mart, Kathie Lee, Nike, Liz
Claiborne, the Gap, Ralph Lauren, and Disney, all
significant abusers of workers' rights). There is
a particularly detailed chart documenting the wages
and working conditions at a number of factories in
China. Still other links take you to personal testimonies
by apparel workers in Bangladesh and Nicaragua.
A rather detailed curriculum vitae of
the NLC's Executive Director Charles Kernaghan reveals
that, among his other more notable accomplishments,
his testimony before Congress in 1996 caused Kathie
Lee Gifford to cry on national television.
Worker Rights Consortium
Another national non-profit organization,
the Worker Rights Consortium, attempts to alleviate
sweatshop abuses by working with colleges and universities
to implement manufacturing Codes of Conduct. These
codes apply to the companies (called 'licensees'),
and their subcontractors, from whom the universities
procure apparel and other goods inscribed with the
university's name or logo. The WRC offers a Model
Code of Conduct which can be used by a member school
in its contracts with licensees, and universities
are 'encouraged' to adopt a code of conduct that is
at least as strong as the WRC model. But a university
meets WRC affiliation requirements as long as its
code of conduct incorporates certain basic protections
for workers in such designated areas as wages, working
conditions. freedom of association, and child labor.
As of October 16, 2001, 88 member schools
were listed as being affiliated with the WRC. Included
among them are the University of Illinois at both
Urbana-Champaign and Chicago, and ISU in Bloomington-Normal.
A university affiliated with the Worker
Rights Consortium is required to furnish the WRC with
data on all of its licensees. The WRC's web site (www.workersrights.org)
includes a useful search feature, with which a person
can type in the name of a member institution and get
a listing of all the university's suppliers. A search
of UIUC yielded a list of 2,357 companies, though
there was some duplication. While the vast majority
of them were firms in the United States, the list
also contained a number of manufacturers in Bangladesh,
Pakistan, Malaysia, China, Honduras, and Mexico, among
others.
However, ascertaining which of these
companies might be sweatshops is a good deal more
difficult. The WRC web site contains a link to what
it calls its "Factory Assessment Program",
but only two factories are currently listed as having
been investigated and found to have engaged in serious
violations of workers' rights. Interestingly, UIUC
does business with both of them - Kukdong International,
a subcontractor located in Atlixco, Mexico that furnishes
'blank fleece products' to Nike, and New Era Cap Company
in Derby, New York, which deals directly with UIUC.
Coming full circle, a comparison of
the list of UIUC's suppliers on the WRC web site with
the testimonies of garment workers in Bangladesh found
on the NLC web site reveals that Janu Akther, one
of the young women currently touring the US, is employed
by Actor Sporting Goods in Savar Dhaka, Bangladesh,
another of UIUC's suppliers.
United Students Against Sweatshops
A third organization engaged in fighting
worker abuse is the United Students Against Sweatshops,
which has affiliated student organizations on a number
of university campuses in the US and abroad. Perusal
of its web site (www.usasnet.org), which is still
somewhat under construction, suggests that the primary
function of the USAS is to encourage students to form
SAS groups on their campus. These campus groups then
educate others in the community about sweatshop issues,
and induce their university to affiliate itself with
the Worker Rights Consortium and develop a code of
conduct for its suppliers.
These three organizations are all of
relatively recent origin, and a tremendous amount
of work remains to be done to eliminate or even reduce
sweatshop abuses around the world. Without question,
the rapidlyincreasing transplantation of garment manufacturing
jobs by multinational corporations in recent years
from the US to factories in 'developing' nations has
only exacerbated the problem.
The principal impediments to humane
treatment of workers abroad seem to be the tremendous
profitability inherent in worker exploitation,and
an absence of effective enforcement mechanisms when
a manufacturer is found to be abusing its employees.
Private sector retailers such as Wal-Mart and Disney
can be reined in only by stockholders with moral qualms
- a most unlikely scenario - or by bad public relations
which may result in slumping sales of their sweatshop-produced
garments.
And while a university is free in theory
to cease doing business with a licensee who fails
to honor the Code of Conduct incorporated into its
contract, both the National Labor Committee and the
Worker Rights Consortium encourage universities to
negotiate with manufacturers in an effort to remedy
violations, improve factory conditions, and maintain
a constructive working relationship. Sadly, as Janu
Akther says through an interpreter, "It's better
to be exploited than have no job in Bangladesh."