Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://www.ucimc.org/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | Email this Article
News :: Miscellaneous
Activists Welcome Ruling That Corporations 'Must Speak Truthfully' Current rating: 0
06 May 2002
When a corporation makes "factual representations about its own products or its own operations, it must speak truthfully," Kennard added, noting that such statements were clearly commercial and hence unprotected speech.
In a ruling hailed by corporate-accountability and labor activists, the California Supreme Court has held that corporations may be liable under the state's consumer-protection laws for misleading advertising or public statements about their products or operations.

A majority of four of the seven Court justices ordered the trial court to proceed with a case brought by Marc Kasky, an activist who charged that Nike, Inc., made false statements about conditions in Asian factories used to produce its shoes and apparel in order to counter criticism that the company was using "sweatshop" labor.

The case's impact could be sweeping both because most major multinational corporations do business in California and are thus subject to its consumer-protection laws and because a growing number of companies are promoting their wares through similar "image" campaigns.

"This puts corporate greenwashers on notice that what they say needs to reflect what they actually do, rather than be a diversion from their true practices," said Josh Karliner, director of the California-based watchdog group, CorpWatch, http://www.corpwatch.org/ .

The case, Kasky v. Nike, was initially dismissed by the trial judge who found that Nike's statements to defend itself against such attacks constituted "non-commercial speech" and were thus protected by the free speech guarantees in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court disagreed. "To the extent Nike's speech represents expression of opinion or points of view on general policy questions such as the value of economic 'globalization,' it is noncommercial speech subject to full First Amendment protection," wrote Justice Joyce Kennard for the majority.

But when a corporation makes "factual representations about its own products or its own operations, it must speak truthfully," Kennard added, noting that such statements were clearly commercial and hence unprotected speech.

"It's a shock, a great surprise," exulted Jeffrey Ballinger, a labor activist whose investigations of Indonesian plants where Nike products were manufactured helped expose the alleged gaps between Nike's claims and actual conditions there.

Nike, the world's biggest producer of athletic shoes, indicated immediately after the decision, which was made public late last week, that it was likely to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a press release, Nike said it was "extremely disappointed" with the judgment which, it added, "sets a dangerous precedent by restraining companies...from making public statements about their business practices when challenged in the arena of public debate."

The company--supported in the case by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Pacific Legal Foundation--stressed that Marc Kasky, the principal plaintiff and his attorneys, would still have to prove in court that its statements were indeed misleading and a violation of the law.

Nike became a major target of labor and anti-globalization campaigners in the mid-1990s both because of its commercial success and the global reach of its production strategy. The Oregon-based company currently has contracts with some 700 plants in more than 50 countries around the world.

In response, Nike launched a wide-ranging public defense of its operations, insisting that its subcontractors were required to respect local labor, environmental, and health and safety laws and regulations.

The corporation hired Goodworks International, a consultancy firm owned by former United Nations Ambassador Andrew Young, to audit some of its factories and then advertised its favorable conclusions in full-page newspaper ads.

But activists charged that these efforts were misleading, and in 1998, Kasky, a California activist, filed suit claiming that Nike engaged in unfair business practices by making false statements about conditions in its Asian factories.

Several labor groups and the Sierra Club were among the organizations that supported the plaintiffs.


Copyright © 2002 OneWorld.net
See also:
http://www.OneWorld.net
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.