Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://www.ucimc.org/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | Email this Article
News :: Civil & Human Rights : Economy : Elections & Legislation : Labor : Political-Economy : Regime : Right Wing
Minimum Wage: The Floor Has Holes In It Current rating: 0
12 Mar 2005
Thanks to callous and indifferent Republicans, the minimum wage hasn't been increased since 1997. Since that time, members of Congress have received seven pay raises totaling $28,500, an increase easily exceeding the total annual pay of two minimum-wage workers, notes Holly Sklar, co-author of Raise The Floor: Wages and Policies That Work For All Of Us.

That's shameful.
A member of Congress making $162,100 a year probably has little comprehension of how difficult it would be to live on less than one-15th of that amount.

That cognition chasm appears to be especially wide and deep for many Republican members of Congress.

On Monday, the U.S. Senate voted 49-46 against a proposal by Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., to boost the federal minimum wage from $5.15 to $7.25 an hour -- a $2.10 increase.

Kennedy had proposed the long-overdue pay hike -- which would have come in three stages over two years -- as an amendment to a bankruptcy reform bill. But it was strongly opposed by Republicans in what was predominantly a party-line vote.

A minimum-wage earner working 40 hours a week has an annual gross income of $10,712. That's less than one-15th of the salary of members of Congress, who also enjoy ample benefits and perks not available to most low-wage workers.

Thanks to callous and indifferent Republicans, the minimum wage hasn't been increased since 1997. Since that time, members of Congress have received seven pay raises totaling $28,500, an increase easily exceeding the total annual pay of two minimum-wage workers, notes Holly Sklar, co-author of Raise The Floor: Wages and Policies That Work For All Of Us.

That's shameful.

Congress should approve a sizable increase in the minimum wage to help low-income workers and their families. Many are desperately struggling to cope with sharply rising housing, health care and energy costs.

A higher wage floor would not only help those making $5.15 an hour but also put upward pressure on the wages of millions of other working-class persons making $1 to $3 more than the current minimum.

When adjusted for inflation, the purchasing power of the minimum wage has sharply eroded since it stood at $1.60 in the late 1960s. Today's minimum wage would have to be raised to $8.70 to provide the same purchasing power as the $1.60 wage floor of nearly four decades ago, according to Kennedy.

A higher minimum wage would help working-class families, low-paid single adults and students trying to work their way through college or save money to buy a car.

Every time that Democrats suggest a minimum-wage increase, Republicans pitch a hissy fit. The GOP hand-wringers invariably claim that an increase in the floor wage would result in widespread layoffs of low-income workers, bring on a rash of small-business failures and fan a sharp rise in inflation.

How come none of these things happened after the last minimum-wage increase was approved in 1997? Indeed, the late 1990s were marked by strong job growth and a booming stock market.

Had Kennedy's amendment passed, when fully phased in, it would have meant $4,368 in increased annual pay for a full-time, minimum-wage worker.

The increase might have meant money for badly needed car repairs, long-postponed dental work, a warm coat for winter, a computer to help a child do schoolwork or the purchase of more nutritious food at the supermarket.

It also might have meant having enough money to enroll in college classes to gain the education and skills needed for a higher-paying job.

Higher wages would give many working-class people more money to spend. That in turn helps the economy and generates more jobs.

Taxpayers who bemoan the cost of social programs to help the poor should realize that higher working-class wages reduce the need for Medicaid, food stamps and government housing subsidies.

Those members of Congress who oppose raising the minimum wage might not realize that many full-time, low-wage workers don't enjoy such benefits as health insurance, a 401(k) savings plan, an expense account or a subsidized membership in a health club. In fact, many of these workers receive little or no paid vacation.

In the wake of Congress' failure to boost the minimum wage, many states are taking action on their own. Fourteen states and the District of Columbia now have higher minimum wages than the federal minimum, and another 17 states have proposals pending to raise the minimum this year.

Commendably, state Rep. Lon Burnam, D-Fort Worth, has filed a bill to raise Texas' minimum wage by $1, to $6.15. But don't expect that bill to get anywhere in a Republican-dominated Legislature.

President Bush has proven that he truly is a compassionate conservative when it comes to catering to the needs of America's affluent. He has successfully pushed, for example, for congressional approval of significant reductions in top marginal income tax rates, taxes on capital gains and dividends and estate taxes, as well as other measures disproportionately benefiting the upper crust.

Now it's time for him to show that his compassionate conservatism extends to the working poor. He should shock us all by championing a substantial minimum wage increase.


Jack Z. Smith is a Star-Telegram editorial writer.

© 2005 Fort-Worth Star-Telegram
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/

Copyright by the author. All rights reserved.
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.