|
Parent Article: Happy New Year To Everybody and Think About My Proposal |
|
Hidden with code "Policy Violation" |
|
Re: Happy New Year To Everybody and Think About My Proposal |
by Anna Epelbaum
aepelbaum (nospam) yahoo.com (unverified) |
Current rating: 0
02 Jan 2005
|
You know what ,'S', if anyone of those who declined my request during the second meeting in IMC on 1/12/04, looked at first or even after
over the Internet they would have found there about twenty times more information in at least 20 different languages than what Phil has published in his article. The problem is that none of people who were at that meeting, whether under the influence of Sandra Ahten, or, pertinent to some other reasons, were concerned with any truth, but the truth of dark spots of her (or some others also) natures. THERE IS NOTHING IN YOUR OFFICIAL POLICY, WHICH CAN ALLOW YOUR EDITORS TO DELETE COMMENTS WHEN THEY INCLUDE POSITIVE EVALUATION OF MY PUBLICATIONS. And that is what ML and some others are doing. At least, two comments to this article, with positive evaluations were DELETED without ANY trace. They were very much 'ON TOPIC' and they DIDN'T include derogatory statements in difference with 'uh-nawn's and yours comments. If you are incapable to have CIVIL behavior, at least in your postings, don't comment my articles, as everything, which I was talking in my comment to 'uh-nawn' seems to be fully applicable to your posting as well. And , as I am not violating ANY policy of this web, in obvious difference with those, like you and 'uh-nawn', who allow themselves derogatory and obnoxious comments, I am not going to consider your comments and/or opinions in the future. And, again, I am intending to publish in this 'OPEN PUBLISHING FORUM' whichever and whenever I want, as it is allowed by this web official rules, which (the rules) I am very well familiar with. I have never violated these rules, by the way.
In short, the only honest way to finish this story is for your stuff, starting with Sandra Ahten, to give me the deepest official apologies. As I understand, you are not able to do so. It means, that your comments, advises, etc. (I think that you are Sandra, though I might be mistaken) are not existing for me in the future!! And don't waste your own or other's energy trying to convince Wayne that I was or is wrong. He has been watching the entire story from the beginning, he is not blind, and he knows what I have done, and who I am better than you and/or any of your associates.
By the way, the only facts, which I have ever mentioned in my publications and am not in full possession of all proofs for them, are my guesses about pen names and live persons under these names. Not all of these guesses, as some I can prove, and they are not guesses any more, but some of them.
If you want to avoid this situation with guesses, THEN WRITE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER YOUR OWN NAME ! GET FROM ANYWHERE ENOUGH HONESTY AND GUTS TO DO SO !!!. But to accuse me in the misinformation because you are craven and dishonest enough to write derogatory, false and 'libelous' statements under numerous different pseudonymous IS SIMPLY RIDICULOUS, and everybody sees it.
And so are ML actions to hide comments, which disclosed some of these pen names. I AM NOT VIOLATING ANY RULE DOING THESE DISCLOSURES. On the contrary, ML abuses his power hiding such comments of mine.
So, dearest (and closest associates), the official apology or no communication. The choice is yours ! |
