Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://www.ucimc.org/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | Email this Article
News :: Miscellaneous
Who's the Rogue State Now? Current rating: 0
28 Aug 2001
Washington's disregard for a number of important treaties and conventions puts the United States in some rather unsavory company.
Aug. 28, 2001

WASHINGTON -- Hardly a week goes by that the United States declines to sign a world treaty on security or the global environment-or threatens o withdraw from one it has already signed.

Even worse is its record on international human rights. Despite lots of high-sounding rhetoric about a "human rights-based foreign policy," the U.S. is no paragon when it comes to action. The U.S. routinely refuses to sign or ratify numerous human rights-related treaties and conventions, and at other times, actually violates internationally agreed upon human rights standards.

Consider the recent record:

Alone among its European and other Western allies, the U.S. continues to impose the death penalty. It even allows imposition of a death sentence against minors and those found to be mentally incompetent, in direct contravention of international human rights law.

By refusing to allow the United Nations to end the devastating economic sanctions on Iraq, the U.S. is responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children and violating virtually all of the economic and social rights of Iraq's civilian population.

The U.S. has refused to ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child, a distinction it shares only with Somalia. It opposed a key provision prohibiting child soldiers under the age of 18, because the Pentagon found it convenient to continue recruiting 17-year-olds for the U.S. military.

The U.S. spent years demanding international support for an International Criminal Court. But throughout the Rome negotiations aimed at creating the Court, U.S. diplomats worked to weaken the independence of the Court, and to insure that no future U.S. war criminal would ever be brought before the Court. Ultimately, while 120 countries cheered the birth of the Court that summer, the U.S. led the seven-nation rejection front (including China, Israel, Iraq, Libya) that refused to support the Court.

Washington stands alone in protecting Israel's illegal military occupation of Palestinian lands, and its continuing violations of human rights and international law, including illegal settlements, and tank and helicopter gunship attacks on refugee camps and other civilian targets.

The U.S. reluctantly signed but has refused to ratify the Convention on Economic and Social Rights. In conference after conference the U.S. has opposed declaring housing and food to be internationally recognized human rights in separate treaties, despite the explicit inclusion of such rights in the convention's own language guaranteeing an adequate standard of living.

The U.S. has refused to ratify the Convention on the Rights of Women, and has strongly opposed UN efforts to make women's right to inherit property an internationally recognized human right.

As a result, there is a growing global dismay at what is widely perceived to be an escalating "go it alone" tendency in U.S. foreign policy, an approach that dismisses the significance of multi-lateralism, international law, and the U.N.

For instance, just days before the UN votes, the Bush administration announced its intention to abandon the requirements of the Kyoto environmental treaty on climate change, and to unilaterally renounce the almost 30-year-old Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty that has been a linchpin of international strategic arms control since 1972. Coming after so many years of big U.S. talk but little U.S. accountability to multi-lateral decision-making, U.N. resolutions, and international treaties, it is not surprising that European allies were furious. Many are now calling the U.S. a "rogue state."

One example of roguish behavior toward the U.N. may have pushed several countries over the edge, from irritation to fury. That is the seemingly endless problem of unpaid U.S. dues. Washington's arrears to the U.N., including both peacekeeping and regular assessments, total over $1.3 billion. In a much praised "negotiated" settlement last year, the U.S. agreed to finally pay a portion of those overdue assessments -- slightly more than $530 million -- if the U.N. accepted a long list of restrictions crafted largely by UN-bashing Senator Jesse Helms. Now, months later, despite the high-profile agreement, even that partial payment has never been sent. The U.S. remains the biggest deadbeat country in the UN.

And finally, it is not only U.S. failures and hypocrisy and double standards on human rights, not only U.S. rejection of multi-lateralism in favor of raw power that antagonizes U.S. friends, allies, and adversaries alike. It is the arrogance with which Washington wields that power that leads to such animosity. One hopes that some here in Washington will take seriously the sobering lesson of what begins to happen to superpowers, even empires, that overreach their legitimacy once too often.


Phyllis Bennis is a Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C., and the author of "Calling the Shots: How Washington Dominates Today's UN."

Copyright 2001, Global Beat Syndicate, 418 Lafayette Street, Suite 554, New York, NY 10003 http://www.nyu.edu/globalbeat/syndicate).
See also:
http://www.nyu.edu/globalbeat/syndicate/bennis082801.html
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.