Comment on this article |
Email this Article
|
Hidden with code "Submitted as Feature" |
News :: Health |
Update on Recent Federal Guidelines and Charity Care Programs of Local Hospitals |
Current rating: 0 |
by Dr. John Hilty Email: jhilty (nospam) shout.net (unverified!) |
04 Mar 2004
|
|
A press conference was held by Champaign County Health
Care Consumers (CCHCC) on March 3rd 2004 regarding recently released Federal
guidelines and their implications for the charity care programs of hospitals.
Recent changes in the charity care programs of two local hospitals, Provena
Covenant Medical Center and Carle Foundation Hospital, both of Urbana,
Illinois, were described. The speakers at this event were Claudia Lennhoff,
Janna McGregor, and Mary Jane Gillespie, who are staff members or affiliated
with CCHCC. Portions of this press conference and its materials are highlighted
below.
In a letter to Richard Davidson, President of the American
Hospital Association (AHA), which was released to the public, Secretary Tommy
Thompson of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) addressed whether
Federal regulations barred hospitals from providing discounts to uninsured or
underinsured patients with limited financial means. In this letter to Mr.
Davidson, which was dated February 19th 2004, Secretary Thompson stated the
following:
"Your letter suggests that HHS regulations require
hospitals to bill all patients using the same schedule of charges and suggests
that as a result, the uninsured are forced to pay 'full price' for their care.
That suggestion is not correct and certainly does not accurately reflect my
policy. The advice you have been given regarding this issue is not consistent
with my understanding of Medicare's billing rules."
As a result of this exchange of letters with Mr. Davidson
of AHA, Secretary Thompson has directed the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid
Services and the Office of Inspector General to prepare summaries of Federal
policy regarding these issues. Copies of these policy summaries are available
through the office of CCHCC or the websites of these organizations. There is
also a "Questions and Answers" document (Uninsured.pdf) that is available
through CCHCC, or it can be downloaded from the following website:
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/FAQ
In the same letter, Secretary Thompson of HHS also
stated:
". . . that hospitals can provide discounts to
uninsured and underinsured patients who cannot afford their hospital bills and
to Medicare beneficiaries who cannot afford their Medicare cost-sharing
obligations. Nothing in the Medicare program rules or regulations prohibit such
discounts. In addition, the Office of Inspector General informs me that
hospitals have the ability to offer discounts to uninsured and underinsured
individuals and cost-sharing waivers to financially needy Medicare
beneficiaries."
In the past, hospital officials have often attempted to
excuse themselves from providing charity care or discounts to financially needy
hospital patients because of HHS rules and regulations, but Secretary Thompson
has clearly indicated that such interpretations are without substantive
justification and do not reflect his policies.
It will be recalled that
the Medicare 100/100+ programs of CCHCC were terminated in 1998 by Diane
Friedman, CEO of Provena Covenant Medical Center, because they supposedly
violated Federal regulations about providing waivers of Medicare co-payments.
This resulted in a lawsuit between Provena Covenant Medical Center and CCHCC
that remains to be settled. And yet, Secretary Thompson has recently issued a
statement that hospitals can provide discounts or waivers on their bills
to financially needy patients, including Medicare beneficiaries. Claudia
Lennhoff announced at the press conference that Provena Covenant Medical Center
has agreed to meet with CCHCC in the near future to discuss the fate of the
Medicare 100/100+ programs, and she is optimistic that an agreement can be
reached.
The guidelines that have been established under Secretary
Thompson have important implications for attempts on the part of consumer
advocates and legislators to eliminate discriminatory billing practices on the
part of the hospital industry and many physician clinics. As the letter from
Mr. Davidson of AHA to Secretary Thompson made clear, patients who are
uninsured or underinsured often pay the highest price for hospital services,
while patients who receive coverage under Medicare, Medicaid, or a Health
Maintenance Organization (HMO), often receive sizable discounts for such
services. As a result, it is the working poor without health insurance who
often receive the largest bills for hospital services.
As recently as
last month (on Feb. 19th), State Senator Dale Righter, a Republican from
Mattoon, Illinois, questioned the legality of a Senate bill that would require
hospitals to provide a discount to needy uninsured patients, implying that this
would violate Medicare or Medicaid regulations of the Department of Health and
Human Services. This occurred during a session of the Senate Health and Human
Services Committee when Senate Bill 552 (the Discriminatory Pricing Reform Act)
was on the agenda under the chairmanship of State Senator Barack Obama, a
Democrat from southside Chicago, who is one of the sponsors of the bill. The
new guidelines that have been issued under Secretary Thompson attempt to lay
such objections to rest.
It should be noted that Senate Bill 552 passed
the senate committee by a 5-4 vote (Democrats voting in favor, Republicans
voting against), and has been fowarded to the state legislature for further
consideration. If Senate Bill 552 is passed by the legislature and signed into
law by Governor Blagojevich, it would:
Prohibit hospitals from collecting more than the
cost of services for hospital care from uninsured patients whose income is
below 300% of the Federal Poverty Level or who spend over 20% of their annual
income on health care.
Prohibit hospitals from undertaking debt
collection activities until an assessment is done to determine whether the
patient meets the Act's eligibility requirements.
Hopefully Senate Bill 552 will be passed into law in the
State of Illinois in the near future. Similar laws are under consideration in
New York and other states.
At the local level, both Provena Covenant and
Carle Foundation Hospital have recently expanded their charity care
programs:
Provena Covenant Medical Center offers a 100%
reduction in charges to patients with household incomes at 120% of the Federal
Poverty Level (FPL) and below, while patients with household incomes up to 300%
of FPL can qualify for a partial reduction of charges on a sliding
scale.
Carle Foundation Hospital offers a 100% reduction in
charges to patients with household incomes at 150% of the Federal Poverty Level
(FPL) and below, while patients with household incomes up to 250% of FPL can
qualify for a partial reduction of charges on a sliding
scale.
At the present time, the Federal Poverty Level is $8,980 for a single
person, $12,120 for a couple, and $18,400 for a family of four. The charity
care program of Provena Covenant Medical Center has been implemented for all
hospitals that are managed by Provena Health.
In the past, neither local
hospital was very outspoken about their charity care policies. CCHCC has
received many complaints in the past from former hospital patients that they
were taken into collections without anyone from the hospital informing them of
the existence of a charity care program. On those occasions when patients
did discover the existence of such a program, they were often told that
it was too late to apply, or they did not qualify, even when they were too poor
to pay off their hospital bills.
More recently, both hospitals have
attempted to make members of the public more aware of the existence of their
charity care programs. Both hospitals provide, or are planning to provide,
information regarding charity care on brochures and their billing statements,
and they have placed ads that describe the availability of charity care.
Furthermore, the time limits on applying for charity care have been greatly
relaxed. Provena Covenant Medical Center allows patients to apply for charity
care at "any time," while Carle Foundation Hospital accepts applications for
charity care prior to the instigation of court action. Thus, both hospitals
have made considerable progress in making their charity programs more
accessible to members of the public.
For those patients who are
uninsured or underinsured, and fail to qualify for charity care under current
guidelines, it is still possible to be sued by either one of the local
hospitals (or their representatives) and taken to court over unpaid hospital
bills. In the past, both Provena Covenant Medical Center and Carle Foundation
Hospital have had former patients arrested over medical debt by requesting a
"body attachment" should they fail to appear in court. There have been cases of
former patients being handcuffed and incarcerated at the Champaign County Jail
in Urbana, Illinois, even though some of these patients were living near or
below the Federal Poverty Level, and were too poor to pay their bills.
Fortunately, this is an unusual collection practice among non-profit hospitals,
and even many for-profit businesses will not request body attachments in
court.
As a result of a recent change in policy under CEO Mark Weiner,
Provena Covenant Medical Center has terminated the use of body attachments
while attempting to collect medical debts from former patients. However, Carle
Foundation Hospital still retains its use for selected cases. The position of
CCHCC is that the use of body attachments is not an appropriate collection
practice for non-profit hospitals. CCHCC supports the discontinuation of body
attachments by Provena Covenant Medical Center, and encourages Carle Foundation
Hospital to discontinue this aggressive collection practice as well.
|
This work is in the public domain |