Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://www.ucimc.org/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

germany

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
london, ontario
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | Email this Article
News :: Civil & Human Rights
Dissent Is Patriotic Current rating: 0
19 Oct 2003
Three anti-war student protesters at UC Berkeley have been slapped with student conduct charges for practising peaceful civil disobedience. Lets help them retain their First Amendment rights.
Dissent is patriotic

Dissent is patriotic

Dear friends:

On March 20, the day after the war on Iraq began, the Berkeley Stop the War Coalition, like many other anti-war groups across the country, held a demonstration on campus to protest the war and demonstrate our opposition to the military policies of the Bush administration. Thousands of students walked out of their classes at noon to join us on Sproul Plaza in what university administrators called the largest protest in decades at the University of California, Berkeley.

The protest was inspiring, all the more so because it was a part of an international movement to oppose war. During the course of the demonstration, several hundred students peacefully marched into Sproul Hall, the university administration building, and held a peaceful sit-in. (We have attached a few news reports of the protest at the bottom of this email). The demands were simple: declare Baghdad University a sister school to UC Berkeley as a show of opposition to war; cease monitoring international students on campus; and stop fee hikes and wage cuts during the course of war. The administration refused each of these demands and arrested 119 protesters.

All criminal charges were dropped against the protesters. And for all but three students, student conduct charges were also dropped. But three students (Rachel Odes, Snehal Shingavi and Michael Smith) who are among the most prominent activists in the coalition now face student conduct charges that would make it impossible for them to protest on campus and would punish them for doing what was right. While the university has offered community service as a kind of plea bargain, it carries with a probationary warning that would make it impossible for student activists to protest again on campus.

We believe that these charges are not only unfair (in that they single out three people from over a hundred to prosecute) but are also unjust. They are designed to intimidate students and political activists and to chill speech. They also represent an attempt to attack one of the most well known anti-war student organizations in the country in order to make it easier to attack other anti-war students organizations across the country.

The irony of it is that today, with no weapons of mass destruction, no proven threat of an attack from Iraq, increasing costs of the occupation, growing numbers of civilian and military casualties and fatalities, continued attacks on civil rights, the protesters have been proven correct - the war on Iraq was wrong.

And, since the war started, not only have fees been raised for students and wages and jobs been cut for employees at the University of California, but international students are now required to register with federal agencies as a condition of enrollment.

And still, the university is going to prosecute student protesters.

On October 14th, the university held formal hearings and found three students guilty of participating in an illegal assembly and refusing to cooperate with university officials for their involvement in the anti-war sit-in that took place in Sproul Hall on March 20, 2003. Not only does this mark an attack on anti-war protesters and people of conscience throughout the country, the entire process from start to finish has been riddled with unfairness and makes a mockery of anything resembling justice.

The problems with the sham of a hearing are almost too many to list: the university refused to have an open trial (until we showed up with forty protesters); the university refused to give students ample time to prepare a defense; one of the three students wasn't even served with a letter telling her to appear at the hearing; the students were unable to gather witnesses in time for the hearing (some of them are out of the country and a few have graduated); the university did not make all of their evidence available to our advocate; the university has singled out three protesters from over 400 who participated in the sit-in and the 119 who were arrested that day for selective prosecution; the university selected an all male hearing panel to adjudicate the hearing; and the students' request for a continuance was ignored.

Instead of being a party to this kangaroo court, students walked out of the hearings in protest and demanded that the university at least consider giving them more time to prepare. The university refused. Other than the blatant disregard for procedure, there are two things that make this decision by UC Berkeley outrageous.

First, that UC Berkeley is the only university in the nation (to our knowledge) that is prosecuting students for protesting the war the day after the bombing began, despite the fact that protests happened on scores of campuses throughout the US.

Second, that student protesters were right about every aspect of the war. There are no weapons of mass destruction. There is no proven threat of attack from Iraq. Civilian and military casualties continue to mount and the US continues to spend exorbitant sums to maintain a military presence in Iraq - yet it fails to turn on the water or electricity. The attacks on civil liberties continue to mount. Fees for students at UC Berkeley and dozens of campuses continue to rise.

We will be sentenced in two weeks, on October 28th, 2003. We intend to protest this decision on that date and will send out information about this as soon as we can.

In the meantime, we need your help. Please take a few moments and write to the Chancellor and the Student Judicial Affairs Office (addresses and phone information below) and tell them that you believe that this decision is unwarranted and unjust. Especially at Berkeley, where there are memorials to Free Speech movement of the 1960s all over campus (the Mario Savio steps and the Free Speech Movement Caf�, these kinds of attacks on free speech and civil disobedience are not only an attempt to roll-back the activist gains won on this campus, but also in defiance of the university's mission to promote free speech and debate.

We have included some talking points below that you may want to include in your conversation or correspondence with the administration at UC Berkeley. Please do email us at info@berkeleystopthewar.org with any correspondence that you send so that we can keep a record of the letters that the administration receives.

Also, please sign our online petition.

Also join Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Peter Camejo and many others and add your name to the letter below that will appear as a full-page advertisement in the UC Berkeley "Daily Cal" newspaper on October 27. This will be the day before the sentencing hearing for three Berkeley students being disciplined for their role in a peaceful anti-war sit-in. Please send your name and affiliation to DefendBerkeley3@aol.com. If you are able to make a contribution to the cost of publishing this letter, please make out a check to "BSTW" (that's the Berkeley Stop the War coalition) and put "Berkeley 3" in the memo line. Send it to: BSTW c/o Snehal Shingavi, 322 Wheeler Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720. Lastly, please forward this letter to professors, students, labor and social justice activists and leaders, writers, artists, journalists and everyone you know who cares about civil liberties and ask them to sign on along with you.

We urgently need your help. Please lend your support to anti-war student activists and activists who are fighting for social justice by letting the administration know that their actions are not supported by members of the community, students, alumni, faculty, and staff.

Sincerely,
Berkeley Stop the War Coalition
ucbstopthewar@hotmail.com

Todd Chretien
Committee to Defend Student Civil Liberties
510-333-4604

UC Berkeley Contacts

Chancellor Robert Berdahl
MAIL: 200 California Hall #1500
Berkeley, CA 94720-1500
TEL: (510) 642-7464
FAX: (510) 643-5499

Assistant Chancellor John Cummins
EMAIL: jcummins@uclink4.berkeley.edu
MAIL: Office of the Chancellor
200 California Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-1500
TEL: (510) 642-7516
FAX: (510) 643-5499

Student Judicial Affairs Officer Neal Rajmaira
EMAIL: osc@uclink4.berkeley.edu
326 Sproul Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
TEL:(510) 643-9069
FAX:(510) 643-3133

Talking Points
1) Students should not face charges or disciplinary actions for participating in non-violent civil disobedience.

2) Activists should be allowed, freely, to speak and protest on campus without harassment from the University or its officers.

3) Any attempt to charge protesters for peaceful protest represents an attack on free speech.

4) The war and occupation of Iraq were wrong and protesters were right to protest.

5) Student activists fought for the right to organize on this campus in the 1960s and should be allowed to continue to organize.

6) The University of California, Berkeley should declare its opposition to the war and occupation by naming Baghdad University a sister school.



Letter to Daily Cal

Berkeley Student Anti-War Protesters Deserve Due Process

On Tuesday, October 14, three University of California, Berkeley students, Rachel Odes, Michael Smith and Snehal Shingavi, were convicted in absentia of "disturbing the peace" by a university disciplinary panel for their role in a March 20, 2003 anti-war sit-in. On that day, 4,000 Berkeley students responded to the beginning of President Bush's invasion of Iraq by rallying on the historic Mario Savio steps of Sproul Hall administration building. Over 400 students then entered Sproul Hall and began a peaceful sit-in to demand that the University of California take a stand against the war by declaring Baghdad University a sister school, refusing to comply with FBI requests for information on foreign students and pledging to refrain from raising tuition and laying off faculty and staff because of budget cuts caused by military spending. UC administrators refused to even discuss these demands and ordered police to make arrests for "trespassing."

Since Sproul Hall is a public building, operated and paid for by student tuition, and it was during business hours, UC police declared the sit-in, which was confined to the front lobby, an "unlawful assembly." Eventually, 119 protesters were arrested.

In the Alameda County District Attorney's judgment, the students' actions did not warrant prosecution and all legal charges were quickly dropped. The UC Berkeley administration, however, decided to press ahead with its own disciplinary charges, which could include penalties ranging from community service to a ban on participating in future protests to suspension from school.

If the conviction against these three prominent activists in the Berkeley Stop the War coalition stands, it will chill free speech at UC Berkeley. Compounding matters, the UC Berkeley administration has made a mockery of due process rights. It has stacked the deck by assigning full-time administrators to prosecute the students, while assigning only two unpaid and inexperienced student advocates to the defense.

The administration has repeatedly violated its own written procedures. For instance, two of the defendants received certified letters notifying them of the hearing on October 3, just seven business days prior to the hearing. The third student, Rachel Odes, never even received a letter. University policy clearly states that defendants must be notified at least 10 days in advance of the hearing. When this fact was brought to his attention, disciplinary hearing committee chair physics professor Robert Jacobsen told Odes that "since her friends told her about it, she only lost a day or two."

This disregard for university rules adversely affects the students' ability to prepare a defense because the administration also asserts that any witnesses or evidence to be used in the hearing must be submitted at least 5 days in advance. Thus, the students had, at most, 48 hours to contact witnesses, gather statements, retain legal counsel and generally prepare themselves for the hearing. The defendants brought these procedural violations to the attention of the five man hearing board and requested a one-month delay. Jacobsen dismissed these concerns out of hand and admonished the students not to pursue a "scorched earth" defense. When supporters in the audience at the hearing gasped, the hearing board chair declared that he would "move the hearing to the men's room" if there were any interference from the public. After realizing that one of the defendants was a woman, he embarrassingly added, "or the women's room."

As the defendants attempted to plead their case, the Jacobsen interrupted them, held up his finger like an umpire and said, "that's one!" When the defendants continued, he continued, "that two!" Before they could be called out on three strikes, Michael Smith spoke up saying, "Our academic careers on are the line. More importantly, this is about the right of students to dissent on this campus and to receive due process when the university comes after us. We are not going to sit here and be part of this joke of a hearing." The three defendants then led their supporters out of the hearing room.

We believe that Berkeley is violating these students' right to due process.

We do not understand why a reasonable delay in the hearing could not be granted.

We protest the decision to convict them in absentia.

We call on UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Berdahl and Dean of Students Karen Kenney to step into this process and cancel the October 28 sentencing hearing.

We demand that a new hearing date be set, on a date mutually agreeable to both parties that respects the students' right to organize an adequate defense.

The Bush Administration has carried out an unprecedented attack on civil liberties in this country over the last two years. The UC Berkeley administration has a special duty to ensure that its academic community stands as a beacon of light for hard-won legal protections for which so many generations have fought. The university should be encouraging discourse and tolerating dissent as part of a diversified educational experience, benefiting the student body and the community as a whole. Instead, it is cutting corners and steamrollering students' rights in its rush to punish opposition to war. It is time for the UC Berkeley administration to come to its senses and grant a new hearing for Odes, Smith and Shingavi.

Signed,
Peter Camejo
Green Party candidate for governor

Noam Chomsky
Professor of Linguistics and Philosophy
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Howard Zinn
Professor Emeritus
Boston University
Author of A People's History of the United States

Anthony Arnove
Editor, Iraq Under Siege
South End Press

Katrina Yeaw
Western Regional Representative
Campus Anti-War Network

Eyad Kishawi
Free Palestine Alliance

Initiated by the Committee to Defend Student Civil Liberties
Affiliations listed for identification purposes only


Articles and reports on the protest


1) War reawakens protest movement at UC Berkeley - Demonstrations held at Sproul Hall, in Berkeley park and at Oakland City Hall

By William Brand, Angela Hill and Mike Adamick, STAFF WRITERS
Oakland Tribune, March 21, 2003

BERKELEY -- America's attack on Iraq brought an instant and spirited protest from students Thursday at the University of California, Berkeley. Police arrested 119 demonstrators inside Sproul Hall at the end of the largest protest on the campus in at least a decade. The rally, sponsored by the Berkeley Coalition to End the War, brought out at least 1,500 spectators -- mostly students.

And unlike most protests, this one didn't end at protesting. All but 19 were UC students, Cooper said.

"There were 18 adults and one nonstudent minor."

Cooper said the Sproul Plaza crowd was the largest for a political demonstration in years. "We had some large demonstrations in the mid-1980s against apartheid," he said. "In the 1990s, there were some antiwar rallies that drew 1,000. But we estimate this crowd at 1,500 today."


2) 119 Arrested in Sproul Takeover

Anti-War Sit-In Freezes Administration for Hours; Thousands Walk Out, Join Noontime Peace Rally

By AMELIA HEAGERTY, ANDREA HERNANDEZ, MARTIN RICARD and NATE TABAK
Friday, March 21, 2003

One hundred seventeen protesters were arrested yesterday afternoon after they refused to leave an anti-war sit-in in the main lobby of Sproul Hall.

More than 30 UC police officers were present, with two to five officers removing each protester. Ninety-eight of those arrested were UC Berkeley students. The majority of the demonstrators were escorted out of the lobby without incident, but several had to be carried.

The students at the Berkeley Stop the War Coalition-organized sit-in had three requests-the same demands they made at their earlier peace rally. They asked UC Berkeley to declare the University of Baghdad its sister school and not increase student fees or cut staff wages during the war. They also demanded the university not give student records, especially those of international students, to federal agencies.

Once the arrests began, it took police less than 90 minutes to empty Sproul's lobby of sit-in participants. Sproul Hall, which houses most of the university's administration, was closed down for more than four hours yesterday. This came at a time when admissions staff were one week away from mailing out acceptance letters.

Officials said they lost valuable time yesterday because the sit-in brought their daily business to a halt. The protesters who refused to stand were dragged, carried or forced to stand with "pain holds." Police forced protesters to comply with orders by twisting their arms behind their backs or pressing the pressure points on their necks, said UC police Capt. Bill Cooper.

After they were removed one by one, all 117 were cited on suspicion of misdemeanor trespassing by the UC Police Department and released.

The demonstrators entered the building shortly after rallying on Sproul Plaza at noon. The arrests started three hours later, after protesters had been addressed by both Vice Chancellor Horace Mitchell and UC police Lt. Jim West.

"We certainly recognize your right to express your opinions about the war," Mitchell said to the crowd. "For those of you who decide you want to be arrested, we ask that you continue to do this in a nonviolent way." West told the Sproul occupants if they did not leave the building, they would be subject to arrest and or campus disciplinary action.

The demonstrators filled the main lobby of Sproul, sitting cross-legged and chanting anti-war sentiments. "One, two, three, four, we're students, we're anti-war. Five, six, seven, eight, stop the violence, stop the hate," they chanted as they continued to occupy the lobby.

"This is the only way to stop (the war) and cause pre-emptive peace," said UC Berkeley freshman David Born. UC Berkeley staff and administrators stood on the sidelines but said they could not accommodate the students' demands.

"There's no way that any of us here can meet any of those demands," Mitchell said. "Those are different decision-making bodies."

A large group of students watched from just outside the door, spilling onto the steps of Sproul Hall and chanting along with those inside. They pounded on the windows and chanted frantically in support of the sit-in participants.

"This was our first time doing this," said UC Berkeley senior Chris Goslow. "We've never participated in a cause before since we've been here (at UC Berkeley). Now we're activists."

UC Berkeley graduate student Snehal Shingavi, an organizer of the sit-in, led the crowd in chants and blasted sentiments on a loudspeaker. As the students were taken from the lobby one by one, those remaining continued to rally, chanting loudly.

When police used pain holds and other techniques to remove individuals from the scene, protesters screamed "Shame! Shame!" at the police angrily and chanted, "The whole world is watching." Although police reported no injuries, Shingavi said some protesters sustained injuries to their eyes, arms and heads.

"People were going limp so police had to drag them," said UC Berkeley junior Azadeh Amani, who was arrested in the protest. "People were banging their heads on the stairs."

Many protesters returned to continue protesting on the steps of Sproul. Other campus activities were affected by the commencement of the war. Many teachers canceled classes, and many students walked out at noon in protest.


3) Coverage from Indymedia

story and pictures - http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/03/1586753.php

pictures - http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/03/1586647.php

audio clip - http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/03/1586672.php


Note: This information has been collated from 3 different mails from Berkeley Stop the War Coalition and Committee to Defend Student Civil Liberties.
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.