Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://www.ucimc.org/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | Email this Article
News :: Elections & Legislation : Government Secrecy : Labor : Political-Economy : Regime : Right Wing
Most Americans Likely to End Up Net Losers When New Tax-Cut Bill is Paid For Current rating: 0
17 May 2006
"The vast majority of American households will receive little or no benefit from the bill, but they will share responsibility for the debt. When the bill comes due, most Americans are almost certain to lose far more than they gain from this legislation."
WASHINGTON - May 17 - New data from the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center indicate that whether the new tax-cut bill the President will sign today is ultimately paid for through program cuts, tax increases, or some combination of the two, the small or non-existent tax benefit that most Americans will get from the bill will likely be outweighed by the cost imposed on them by the financing measures.

"There is no such thing as a free lunch. This tax bill -- like all recent tax legislation -- is being financed with borrowed money, and that money will eventually have to be paid back," said Leonard Burman, director of the Tax Policy Center. "The vast majority of American households will receive little or no benefit from the bill, but they will share responsibility for the debt. When the bill comes due, most Americans are almost certain to lose far more than they gain from this legislation."

A Center on Budget and Policies report by Burman and CBPP staff Isaac Shapiro and Aviva Aron-Dine, based on the Tax Policy Center analysis, considers three possible ways of paying for the tax cuts. It finds that under all three scenarios, the average household with income below $100,000 would lose more than it gains from the tax bill. A household in the middle of the income spectrum, which will receive an average of $20 from the bill, will end up with:

-- a net loss of $430 if the bill is paid for largely through cuts in federal programs, with each household paying the same dollar amount to finance the bill;

-- a net loss of $110 if the bill is paid for by increasing all households' income tax burdens by the same percentage; and

-- a net loss of $240 if the bill is paid for with a combination of the first two approaches.

High-income households, in contrast, end up as substantial net winners under all three scenarios, largely because the tax-cut bill gives them such sizable benefits. For example, the average household with income above $1 million will receive almost $43,000 in tax benefits from the new law (before financing costs are considered).

The full analysis is available at: http://www.cbpp.org/5-17-06tax.htm.

Additional analyses of the tax reconciliation bill are available at: http://www.cbpp.org/pubs/fedtax.htm

This work licensed under a
Creative Commons license
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.