Printed from Urbana-Champaign IMC : http://www.ucimc.org/
UCIMC Independent Media 
Center
Media Centers

[topics]
biotech

[regions]
united states

oceania

[projects]
video
satellite tv
radio
print

[process]
volunteer
tech
process & imc docs
mailing lists
indymedia faq
fbi/legal updates
discussion

west asia
palestine
israel
beirut

united states
worcester
western mass
virginia beach
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
danbury, ct
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
arkansas
arizona

south asia
mumbai
india

oceania
sydney
perth
melbourne
manila
jakarta
darwin
brisbane
aotearoa
adelaide

latin america
valparaiso
uruguay
tijuana
santiago
rosario
qollasuyu
puerto rico
peru
mexico
ecuador
colombia
chile sur
chile
chiapas
brasil
bolivia
argentina

europe
west vlaanderen
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
russia
romania
portugal
poland
paris/ăŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
cyprus
croatia
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant

east asia
qc
japan
burma

canada
winnipeg
windsor
victoria
vancouver
thunder bay
quebec
ottawa
ontario
montreal
maritimes
hamilton

africa
south africa
nigeria
canarias
ambazonia

www.indymedia.org

This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software
&
the friendly folks of
AcornActiveMedia.com

Comment on this article | Email this Article
News :: Civil & Human Rights : Elections & Legislation : Health : Political-Economy : Regime
Only One Out of Nine Low-Income Seniors Approved for New Medicare Drug Subsidies Current rating: 0
05 Dec 2005
Out of 5.7 Million Low-Income Seniors Who Must Enroll in Program to Receive Subsidized Drug Coverage, Only 660,000 Were Approved as of End of November
WASHINGTON - December 5 - With one month left before the new Medicare prescription drug program begins on January 1, fewer than one out of nine low-income seniors have been approved to receive low-income drug subsidies. Without such subsidies, participation in the new drug program will be unaffordable for those low-income seniors.

According to the Social Security Administration, only 660,000—out of approximately 5.7 million low-income seniors eligible for subsidized drug coverage who must apply and be approved for such coverage—were approved for low-income subsidies as of November 29.

“The most important part of the new Medicare drug legislation was the special help that was supposed to be made available for low-income seniors,” said Ron Pollack, Executive Director of Families USA. “Unfortunately, these numbers are very discouraging, and it now appears likely that many millions of low-income seniors will be without the help they need to make drugs affordable.”

During the past few months, there have been many examples of the complexity of the new Medicare prescription drug program. Less attention has been given to the complexity of the special drug coverage and subsidies intended for low-income seniors.

Three categories of low-income seniors were established under the new Medicare legislation, and each group will receive different benefits and will be enrolled through separate processes:

1. Non-Medicaid Low-Income Beneficiaries: At least 5.7 million low-income seniors and people with disabilities who receive no Medicaid benefits are projected by the Congressional Budget Office to be eligible for special drug subsidies under the new Medicare legislation. They must proactively apply for this benefit, usually with the Social Security Administration. To qualify, they need to have incomes below 150 percent of the federal poverty level ($14,355 for a senior living alone, $19,245 for a couple) and less than $10,000 in assets for an individual and $20,000 for a couple. The actual amount of the drug subsidies provided to these beneficiaries varies based on their income and assets.

According to the Social Security Administration, 3.8 million people have applied for low-income subsidies, but only 660,000 have been approved. The 660,000 approved applications constitute only 10.5 percent of the low-income beneficiaries who must apply and be approved for low-income subsidies.

2. The So-Called “Dual Eligibles”: This is a group of approximately 6.4 million low-income Medicare beneficiaries who currently participate both in Medicare and Medicaid. Since this group is readily identifiable, any dual eligible person who does not voluntarily enroll in the program by January 1 will be automatically enrolled by the government in a plan and will receive the low-income subsidy. Federal litigation is pending to ensure that the automatic enrollment system actually works.

3. “Medicare Savings Program” Participants: These approximately 1.1 million beneficiaries have slightly higher incomes than dual eligibles and receive Medicaid subsidies to pay for their Medicare premiums and cost-sharing. Since these low-income people are also readily identifiable, those who do not voluntarily enroll in the program will be automatically enrolled by May 15 in a plan and will receive low-income subsidies.

The complexity of the Part D benefit is almost certainly discouraging potentially eligible low-income beneficiaries from applying.

“The general confusion and bewilderment experienced by seniors is considerably worse for low-income seniors and has no doubt contributed to low enrollment,” said Pollack. “Low-income seniors not only have to navigate the maze of their Part D options, but they also have the added burden of having to apply to a separate government agency.”
See also:
http://www.familiesusa.org/

This work is in the public domain
Add a quick comment
Title
Your name Your email

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.