Calyx's contacts at Indymedia are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Indymedia is keenly aware of this kind of fishing expedition, as it has happened before, under similar circumstances. In April of 2001, while tens of thousands demonstrated against the proposed Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) in the streets of Quebec City, the federal government attempted to do something very similar. In this case the FBI and Secret Service obtained an order issued by Judge Benton, directing the IMC to supply the FBI with "all user connection logs" for April 20 and 21st from a web server occupying an IP address which the Secret Service believed belonged to the IMC. At that time, IMC counsel Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation had this to say, and it is still apropos today:

[ More information: www.indymedia.org/fbi ]

The IMC was able to win that battle, and as a result of this attempt to violate our clear rights, we felt it prudent to develop a policy of not voluntarily gathering data for the government on people who visit our websites, or who post material to sites. ". . . we do not log IP addresses as a way of protecting the privacy of our visitors. . ."

[ More info: Indymedia FAQ (EN) | EFF | ACLU]

The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment protects the right to communicate anonymously with the press and for political purposes. We cannot understand why the Secret Service does not respect the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, a federal statute requires such attempts against the press to be approved by the Attorney General - and only after alternatives have been exhausted. It is plain that these standards have not been met in the past and are not being met here.

The particular order in question in the current, New York, case is puzzling: it is Title 18 U.S.C. 594 - "Intimidation or interference of voters." This plainly has not happened, but it is ironic to be bring up this subject during the Republican National Convention if Bush's connections to voter fraud and disenfranchisement in Florida during the last election are remembered. Another example is the Republican party's connections to the largest corporate voting interference ever, The Diebold Corporation, who make flawed electronic voting systems. In October of 2003, Diebold issued a cease and desist notice to Indymedia, because we had links to mirrors of a damning internal Diebold memo that was leaked. As a result of challenges by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Online Policy Group (OPG), and Indymedia, Diebold was forced to back down out of embarrassment.

[ Press release | more information | Black Box Voting ]

It is truly disappointing that this United States government, which holds the moral ideals of free speech and free assembly, continues to resort to fear, intimidation, and terrorizing people who celebrate these essential American values.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NEW YORK - In a letter sent today in response to a grand jury subpoena issued by the Secret Service, the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Civil Liberties Union said they are representing a web hosting service and administrators of an independent media website regarding the anonymous posting of publicly available information about delegates to the Republican National Convention.

The groups said the investigation is but the latest example of government agencies using law enforcement powers to chill free speech and intimidate protesters.

"This type of investigation is really a form of intimidation and a message to activists that they will pay a price for speaking out," said ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beeson. "The posting of publicly available information about people who are in the news should not trigger an investigation. Indeed, if the mere posting of the delegates' name is cause for alarm, then the Secret Service should be investigating the many Republican websites where the same kind of information is available."

Beeson added that the posting did not include anything remotely threatening, but involved political speech fully protected by the First Amendment. Indymedia.org is the website of the Independent Media Center, a collective of independent media organizations and journalists.

The ACLU and NYCLU are also defending Calyx Internet Access, a web hosting service for the Indymedia website. Last week, Calyx’s president, Nicholas Merrill, received a grand jury subpoena to turn over contact information for Indymedia. Merrill said that he contacted the four men he knew of -- and the ACLU -- upon receiving the subpoena, and the men agreed that Calyx could provide their information because they had nothing to hide. In fact, the men are not responsible for posting the delegate names, and it is not clear who is, because Indymedia has an anonymous posting policy.

In its letter to the Secret Service today, the ACLU provided the e-mail addresses of the four Indymedia administrators --- Matt Toups, Brian Szymanski, Micah Anderson and one man who prefers not to be named publicly -- and advised the agency that they are representing them in any formal or informal questioning of them or Merrill.

In a statement issued today, Toups, a 22-year-old undergraduate at Carnegie Mellon University, said: “The right of an author to choose anonymity is an important part of what Indymedia stands for because we work to create a safe space for dissenting views. Unfortunately, the United States is becoming an increasingly repressive and chilling environment for free speech, thanks to government harassment like the recent attempts to question Indymedia and other activist groups in New York for the Republican National Convention.”

Beeson said she found it ironic that the Secret Service subpoena said that the men were sought in connection with an investigation of voter intimidation. "The only intimidation taking place here is the Secret Service intimidating people who speak out against the government," she said. “Unfortunately, the Secret Service has a very recent history of preventing Americans from exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Last year, the ACLU filed a class-action lawsuit against the Secret Service over the agency’s practice of forcing activists into remote "protest zones" during Bush administration events, while allowing pro-Bush supporters to remain in close proximity. A judge dismissed the case after the agency insisted that the practice was not a matter of policy and agreed that such a policy would violate important free speech rights protected under the Constitution. The ACLU is still investigating complaints of restrictions against protesters.

In recent weeks, the ACLU and its affiliates around the country have received complaints that law enforcement officials throughout the U.S. have been monitoring activists they believe are planning to protest at major national political events, including the Republican National Convention in New York, which has already drawn hundreds of thousands of protesters.

In Missouri, the ACLU is defending three activists who were subpoenaed as part of an investigation by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force. The men, who have no history of violent activity, were subpoenaed to appear before a federal grand jury on July 29, which prevented them from traveling to Boston to protest at the Democratic National Convention as they had planned. For more on that story, go to http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=16248&c=282

In addition to Beeson, the five men in today's case are represented by Jameel Jaffer of the ACLU and Arthur Eisenberg, Legal Director of the NYCLU.

The Secret Service subpoena is online at: http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=16330&c=206

The ACLU letter to the Secret Service is online at:  http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=16336&c=206

Statements from the web host and three of the Indymedia administrators are online here:

Micah Anderson - http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=16338&c=86
Nicholas Merrill - http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=16332&c=86
Brian Szymanski - http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=16331&c=86
Matt Toups – http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=16334&c=86